Model Comparison
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
vs. Solar Mini
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Upstage
Recommended Pick
UpSolar Mini4 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Solar Mini
100.0 value score
6.0 reasoning / $0.15/1M
Lowest Price
Solar Mini
$0.15/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
57.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
71.9 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Solar Mini has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Solar Mini is 13.3x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B leads Solar Mini by 51.7 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Solar Mini wins 4 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Mini
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Processing terms vary by selected model. Review the current Privacy Policy and DPA before using sensitive data.
OpenAI-compatible inference
Choose from the current model catalog. Processing terms vary by selected model and service.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Top Pick Up Solar Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $2.00/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Output Cost | $6.00/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Upstage |
| Release Date | Aug 12, 2026 | Jan 25, 2024 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 40.0 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 2640ms | — |
| Latency | 52690ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 48.1 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 57.7 | 6.0 |
| Intelligence | 57.7 | 6.0 |
| Coding | 71.9 | — |
Key Takeaways
Solar Mini offers the best value at $0.15/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the strongest reasoning profile with a 57.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B reaches a 71.9 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Solar Mini
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
