Model Comparison
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
vs. Solar Pro 4
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Upstage
Recommended Pick
UpSolar Pro 47 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Solar Pro 4
100.0 value score
32.7 reasoning / $0.52/1M
Lowest Price
Solar Pro 4
$0.30/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
46.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
71.9 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Solar Pro 4 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Solar Pro 4 is 6.7x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.
Speed gap
Solar Pro 4 generates about 1.7x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B leads Solar Pro 4 by 14.0 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B leads Solar Pro 4 by 19.2 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Pro 4
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Processing terms vary by selected model. Review the current Privacy Policy and DPA before using sensitive data.
OpenAI-compatible inference
Choose from the current model catalog. Processing terms vary by selected model and service.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Top Pick Up Solar Pro 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $2.00/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Output Cost | $6.00/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00/1M | $0.52/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Upstage |
| Release Date | Aug 12, 2026 | Aug 6, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 40.1 tok/s | 70.1 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2530ms | 1980ms |
| Latency | 52360ms | 30520ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 25.0 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 46.7 | 32.7 |
| Intelligence | 46.7 | 32.7 |
| Coding | 71.9 | 52.7 |
Key Takeaways
Solar Pro 4 offers the best value at $0.30/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the strongest reasoning profile with a 46.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B reaches a 71.9 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Solar Pro 4
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
