Model Comparison
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)
vs. Solar Mini
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Upstage
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.8 27B (xhigh)3 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Reasoning, Intelligence
Best Value
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)
100.0 value score
52.0 reasoning / $1.13/1M
Lowest Price
Solar Mini
$0.15/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)
52.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)
68.1 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Solar Mini is 3.3x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) leads Solar Mini by 46.0 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) wins 3 measurable categories, including Value, Reasoning, Intelligence.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Mini
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Processing terms vary by selected model. Review the current Privacy Policy and DPA before using sensitive data.
OpenAI-compatible inference
Choose from the current model catalog. Processing terms vary by selected model and service.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) | Up Solar Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.50/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Output Cost | $3.00/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.13/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Upstage |
| Release Date | Aug 14, 2026 | Jan 25, 2024 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 41.0 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 4180ms | — |
| Latency | 52970ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 86.5 |
| Reasoning Score | 52.0 | 6.0 |
| Intelligence | 52.0 | 6.0 |
| Coding | 68.1 | — |
Key Takeaways
Solar Mini offers the best value at $0.15/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 52.0 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) reaches a 68.1 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Solar Mini
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
