Model Comparison
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)
vs. Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.8 27B (Medium)3 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Reasoning, Intelligence
Best Value
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)
100.0 value score
17.5 reasoning / $1.13/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)
$0.50/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)
17.5 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) leads Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) by 7.5 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) wins 3 measurable categories, including Value, Reasoning, Intelligence.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) | Al Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.50/1M | $0.50/1M |
| Output Cost | $3.00/1M | $3.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.13/1M | $1.13/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Aug 14, 2026 | Aug 14, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 46.6 tok/s | 48.4 tok/s |
| TTFT | 3930ms | 3910ms |
| Latency | 46840ms | 3910ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 57.1 |
| Reasoning Score | 17.5 | 10.0 |
| Intelligence | 17.5 | 10.0 |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) offers the best value at $0.50/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 17.5 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
