Model Comparison
Qwen3.8 27B (medium)
vs. Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3 8B (Non-reasoning)5 metric winsStrongest on: Input price, Output price, Blended price
Best Value
Qwen3.8 27B (medium)
100.0 value score
44.5 reasoning / $1.13/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning)
$0.18/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.8 27B (medium)
44.5 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.8 27B (medium)
56.1 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3.8 27B (medium) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) is 2.8x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.8 27B (medium).
Speed gap
Qwen3.8 27B (medium) generates about 1.3x as many tokens per second as Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.8 27B (medium) leads Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) by 39.7 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) wins 5 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, Blended price, TTFT.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.8 27B (medium)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Processing terms vary by selected model. Review the current Privacy Policy and DPA before using sensitive data.
OpenAI-compatible inference
Choose from the current model catalog. Processing terms vary by selected model and service.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.8 27B (medium) | Top Pick Al Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.50/1M | $0.18/1M |
| Output Cost | $3.00/1M | $0.70/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.13/1M | $0.31/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Aug 14, 2026 | Apr 28, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 50.6 tok/s | 40.0 tok/s |
| TTFT | 3880ms | 3660ms |
| Latency | 43430ms | 3660ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 39.1 |
| Reasoning Score | 44.5 | 4.8 |
| Intelligence | 44.5 | 4.8 |
| Coding | 56.1 | — |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.18/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.8 27B (medium) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 44.5 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.8 27B (medium) reaches a 56.1 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.8 27B (medium)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
