Model Comparison
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)
vs. Beam 1.0
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Reflection
Recommended Pick
ReBeam 1.09 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Beam 1.0
100.0 value score
17.7 reasoning / $0.60/1M
Lowest Price
Beam 1.0
$0.40/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Beam 1.0
17.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Differences That Matter
Best value
Beam 1.0 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Beam 1.0 is 1.3x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.8 27B (Medium).
Speed gap
Beam 1.0 generates about 8.3x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.8 27B (Medium).
Reasoning gap
Beam 1.0 leads Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) by 0.2 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Beam 1.0 wins 9 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Beam 1.0
Reflection
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) | Top Pick Re Beam 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.50/1M | $0.40/1M |
| Output Cost | $3.00/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.13/1M | $0.60/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Reflection |
| Release Date | Aug 14, 2026 | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 46.6 tok/s | 388.7 tok/s |
| TTFT | 3930ms | 690ms |
| Latency | 46840ms | 5840ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 52.7 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 17.5 | 17.7 |
| Intelligence | 17.5 | 17.7 |
Key Takeaways
Beam 1.0 offers the best value at $0.40/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Beam 1.0 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 17.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.8 27B (Medium)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Beam 1.0
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
