Model Comparison
Qwen3.8 27B (medium)
vs. Step 5 Preview
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, StepFun
Recommended Pick
StStep 5 Preview6 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Output price, Throughput
Best Value
Step 5 Preview
100.0 value score
43.7 reasoning / $1.43/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3.8 27B (medium)
$0.50/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Step 5 Preview
43.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.8 27B (medium)
56.1 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Step 5 Preview has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3.8 27B (medium) is 2.0x cheaper on input tokens than Step 5 Preview.
Speed gap
Step 5 Preview generates about 1.7x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.8 27B (medium).
Reasoning gap
Step 5 Preview leads Qwen3.8 27B (medium) by 16.1 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Step 5 Preview wins 6 measurable categories, including Value, Output price, Throughput, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.8 27B (medium)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Step 5 Preview
StepFun
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.8 27B (medium) | Top Pick St Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.50/1M | $1.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $3.00/1M | $2.70/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.13/1M | $1.43/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | StepFun |
| Release Date | Aug 14, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 49.2 tok/s | 83.2 tok/s |
| TTFT | 3860ms | 4250ms |
| Latency | 44490ms | 28300ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 80.0 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 27.6 | 43.7 |
| Intelligence | 27.6 | 43.7 |
| Coding | 56.1 | — |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.8 27B (medium) offers the best value at $0.50/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Step 5 Preview has the strongest reasoning profile with a 43.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.8 27B (medium) reaches a 56.1 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.8 27B (medium)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
Step 5 Preview
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
