Model Comparison
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)6 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
100.0 value score
34.7 reasoning / $1.13/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
$0.50/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
34.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
44.6 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) is 3.0x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct.
Speed gap
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct generates about 1.4x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) leads Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct by 16.5 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) wins 6 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Processing terms vary by selected model. Review the current Privacy Policy and DPA before using sensitive data.
OpenAI-compatible inference
Choose from the current model catalog. Processing terms vary by selected model and service.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) | Al Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.50/1M | $1.50/1M |
| Output Cost | $3.00/1M | $7.50/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.13/1M | $3.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Aug 14, 2026 | Jul 22, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 47.8 tok/s | 65.0 tok/s |
| TTFT | 3870ms | 2980ms |
| Latency | 3870ms | 2980ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 19.7 |
| Reasoning Score | 34.7 | 18.2 |
| Intelligence | 34.7 | 18.2 |
| Coding | 44.6 | — |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.50/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 34.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) reaches a 44.6 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
