Model Comparison
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Beam 1.0
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Reflection
Recommended Pick
ReBeam 1.08 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Beam 1.0
100.0 value score
17.7 reasoning / $0.60/1M
Lowest Price
Beam 1.0
$0.40/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Beam 1.0
17.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Differences That Matter
Best value
Beam 1.0 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Beam 1.0 is 1.3x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning).
Speed gap
Beam 1.0 generates about 7.5x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Beam 1.0 leads Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) by 7.7 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Beam 1.0 wins 8 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Beam 1.0
Reflection
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Re Beam 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.50/1M | $0.40/1M |
| Output Cost | $3.00/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.13/1M | $0.60/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Reflection |
| Release Date | Aug 14, 2026 | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 47.0 tok/s | 353.3 tok/s |
| TTFT | 3890ms | 670ms |
| Latency | 3890ms | 6330ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 30.1 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 10.0 | 17.7 |
| Intelligence | 10.0 | 17.7 |
Key Takeaways
Beam 1.0 offers the best value at $0.40/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Beam 1.0 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 17.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Beam 1.0
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
