Model Comparison
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Hy4
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Tencent
Recommended Pick
TeHy46 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Output price, Throughput
Best Value
Hy4
100.0 value score
34.6 reasoning / $1.25/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
$0.50/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Hy4
34.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Differences That Matter
Best value
Hy4 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) is 1.7x cheaper on input tokens than Hy4.
Speed gap
Hy4 generates about 2.1x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Hy4 leads Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) by 24.6 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Hy4 wins 6 measurable categories, including Value, Output price, Throughput, TTFT.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Hy4
Tencent
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Te Hy4 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.50/1M | $0.83/1M |
| Output Cost | $3.00/1M | $2.50/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.13/1M | $1.25/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Tencent |
| Release Date | Aug 14, 2026 | Nov 3, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 44.2 tok/s | 94.1 tok/s |
| TTFT | 3920ms | 2690ms |
| Latency | 3920ms | 23940ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 32.1 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 10.0 | 34.6 |
| Intelligence | 10.0 | 34.6 |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.50/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Hy4 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 34.6 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Hy4
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
