Model Comparison
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
vs. Hy4
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Tencent
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3.8-Flash-Next4 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
100.0 value score
28.6 reasoning / $0.23/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
$0.15/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Hy4
34.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 5.6x cheaper on input tokens than Hy4.
Reasoning gap
Hy4 leads Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by 6.0 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next wins 4 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Hy4
Tencent
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Te Hy4 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.15/1M | $0.83/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.47/1M | $2.50/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.23/1M | $1.25/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Tencent |
| Release Date | Aug 26, 2026 | Nov 3, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 61.5 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1970ms | — |
| Latency | 34470ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 22.2 |
| Reasoning Score | 28.6 | 34.6 |
| Intelligence | 28.6 | 34.6 |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next offers the best value at $0.15/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Hy4 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 34.6 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Hy4
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
