Model Comparison

Qwen3.8 Max
vs. Beam 1.0

Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Reflection

Recommended Pick

Beam 1.06 metric wins

Strongest on: Input price, Output price, Blended price

Lowest Price

Beam 1.0

$0.40/1M input price

Differences That Matter

Price gap

Beam 1.0 is 5.0x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.8 Max.

Speed gap

Beam 1.0 generates about 9.8x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.8 Max.

Top-pick rationale

Beam 1.0 wins 6 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, Blended price, Throughput.

Live compare

Response Face-Off

Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.

10 comparisons left in 24h

Qwen3.8 Max

Alibaba

Waiting

TTFT

—

Time

—

tok/s

—

Tokens

—

Cost

—

Waiting

Beam 1.0

Reflection

Waiting

TTFT

—

Time

—

tok/s

—

Tokens

—

Cost

—

Waiting

Which answer was more useful?

Secure AI Chat made in Europe

Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.

Chat for free

EU-hosted open models, one API

Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.

Get API access

Full Comparison

Metric	Al Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba	Top Pick Re Beam 1.0 Reflection
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input Cost	$2.00/1M	$0.40/1M
Output Cost	$6.00/1M	$1.20/1M
Blended (3:1)	$3.00/1M	$0.60/1M
Specifications
Organization	Alibaba	Reflection
Release Date	Aug 3, 2026	Oct 16, 2026
Performance & Speed
Throughput	40.0 tok/s	390.4 tok/s
TTFT	2970ms	700ms
Latency	52920ms	5820ms
Composite Indices
Value Score	—	100.0
Reasoning Score	—	17.7
Intelligence	—	17.7