Model Comparison
Qwen3.8 Max
vs. Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, ByteDance Seed
Recommended Pick
BySeed-OSS-36B-Instruct4 metric winsStrongest on: Input price, Output price, Blended price
Lowest Price
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
$0.21/1M input price
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct is 9.5x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.8 Max.
Top-pick rationale
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct wins 4 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, Blended price, TTFT.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.8 Max
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
ByteDance Seed
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.8 Max | Top Pick By Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $2.00/1M | $0.21/1M |
| Output Cost | $6.00/1M | $0.57/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | ByteDance Seed |
| Release Date | Aug 3, 2026 | Aug 20, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 40.3 tok/s | 39.6 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2940ms | 2820ms |
| Latency | 52600ms | 53360ms |
Key Takeaways
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct offers the best value at $0.21/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.8 Max
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
