Model Comparison
Qwen3.8 Max
vs. Solar Pro 4
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Upstage
Recommended Pick
UpSolar Pro 47 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Solar Pro 4
100.0 value score
28.2 reasoning / $0.52/1M
Lowest Price
Solar Pro 4
$0.30/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3.8 Max
40.2 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.8 Max
71.8 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Solar Pro 4 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Solar Pro 4 is 6.7x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.8 Max.
Speed gap
Solar Pro 4 generates about 1.7x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.8 Max.
Reasoning gap
Qwen3.8 Max leads Solar Pro 4 by 12.0 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen3.8 Max leads Solar Pro 4 by 19.1 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3.8 Max
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Pro 4
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3.8 Max | Top Pick Up Solar Pro 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $2.00/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Output Cost | $6.00/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00/1M | $0.52/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Upstage |
| Release Date | Aug 3, 2026 | Aug 6, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 38.3 tok/s | 66.1 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2860ms | 2000ms |
| Latency | 55120ms | 32250ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 24.9 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 40.2 | 28.2 |
| Intelligence | 40.2 | 28.2 |
| Coding | 71.8 | 52.7 |
Key Takeaways
Solar Pro 4 offers the best value at $0.30/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3.8 Max has the strongest reasoning profile with a 40.2 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.8 Max reaches a 71.8 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3.8 Max
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Solar Pro 4
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
