Model Comparison
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning)
vs. Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) 14 metric wins Strongest on: Input price, Output price, TTFT
Lowest Price
Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning)
30.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning)
7.1 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) leads Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) by 6.9 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) leads Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) by 0.4 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) wins 14 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Al Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.18/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.20/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.18/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Apr 28, 2025 | Oct 14, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 64.5 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1293ms | — |
| Latency | 1293ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 30.6 | 23.8 |
| Intelligence | 10.6 | 13.7 |
| Coding | 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Math | 24.3 | 25.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 45.2% | 49.4% |
| MMLU Pro | 64.3% | 70.0% |
| HLE | 2.8% | 4.4% |
| LiveCodeBench | 20.2% | 32.0% |
| MATH 500 | 82.8% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 24.3% | 25.7% |
| AIME (Original) | 24.3% | — |
| SciCode | 16.8% | 17.1% |
| LCR | 0.0% | 21.3% |
| IFBench | 28.6% | 36.6% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 24.9% | 15.5% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 2.3% | 1.5% |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 30.6 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) reaches a 7.1 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Qwen3 VL 4B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
