Model Comparison
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
vs. QwQ 32B
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Alibaba
Recommended Pick
Al QwQ 32B 10 metric wins Strongest on: TTFT, Reasoning, GPQA
Best Value
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
100.0 value score
36.1 reasoning / $0.35/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
$0.19/1M input price
Best Reasoning
QwQ 32B
45.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
19.4 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct is 3.5x cheaper on input tokens than QwQ 32B.
Speed gap
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct generates about 3.5x as many tokens per second as QwQ 32B.
Reasoning gap
QwQ 32B leads Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct by 9.5 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
QwQ 32B wins 10 measurable categories, including TTFT, Reasoning, GPQA, MMLU Pro.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
QwQ 32B
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct | Top Pick Al QwQ 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.19/1M | $0.66/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.84/1M | $1.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.35/1M | $0.74/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Jul 31, 2025 | Mar 5, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 110.9 tok/s | 31.4 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1383ms | 448ms |
| Latency | 1383ms | 79738ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 59.7 |
| Reasoning Score | 36.1 | 45.6 |
| Intelligence | 20.0 | 19.7 |
| Coding | 19.4 | — |
| Math | 29.0 | 29.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 51.6% | 59.3% |
| MMLU Pro | 70.6% | 76.4% |
| HLE | 4.0% | 8.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | 40.3% | 63.1% |
| MATH 500 | 89.3% | 95.7% |
| AIME 2025 | 29.0% | 29.0% |
| AIME (Original) | 29.7% | 78.0% |
| SciCode | 27.8% | 35.8% |
| LCR | 29.0% | 25.0% |
| IFBench | 32.7% | 38.8% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 34.5% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 15.2% | — |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct offers the best value at $0.19/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
QwQ 32B has the strongest reasoning profile with a 45.6 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct reaches a 19.4 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
QwQ 32B
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
