Model Comparison
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
vs. Solar Pro 4
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Upstage
Recommended Pick
Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Solar Pro 4
100.0 value score
41.6 reasoning / $0.52/1M
Lowest Price
Solar Pro 4
$0.30/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Solar Pro 4
41.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Solar Pro 4
52.7 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Solar Pro 4 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Solar Pro 4 is 1.5x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct.
Speed gap
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct generates about 1.1x as many tokens per second as Solar Pro 4.
Reasoning gap
Solar Pro 4 leads Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct by 28.0 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Solar Pro 4 wins 7 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Pro 4
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Processing terms vary by selected model. Review the current Privacy Policy and DPA before using sensitive data.
OpenAI-compatible inference
Choose from the current model catalog. Processing terms vary by selected model and service.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct | Top Pick Up Solar Pro 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.45/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Output Cost | $2.25/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.90/1M | $0.52/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Upstage |
| Release Date | Jul 31, 2025 | Aug 6, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 89.6 tok/s | 78.2 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2620ms | 1950ms |
| Latency | 2620ms | 27540ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 19.1 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 13.6 | 41.6 |
| Intelligence | 13.6 | 41.6 |
| Coding | — | 52.7 |
Key Takeaways
Solar Pro 4 offers the best value at $0.30/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Solar Pro 4 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 41.6 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Solar Pro 4 reaches a 52.7 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Solar Pro 4
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development