Model Comparison
Qwen3 Max Thinking
vs. Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Allen Institute for AI
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3 Max Thinking2 metric winsStrongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 Max Thinking
32.5 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Differences That Matter
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 Max Thinking leads Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B by 24.4 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3 Max Thinking wins 2 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B
Allen Institute for AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Processing terms vary by selected model. Review the current Privacy Policy and DPA before using sensitive data.
OpenAI-compatible inference
Choose from the current model catalog. Processing terms vary by selected model and service.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3 Max Thinking | Al Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | — | — |
| Output Cost | — | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Allen Institute for AI |
| Release Date | Jan 26, 2026 | Jan 30, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Reasoning Score | 32.5 | 8.1 |
| Intelligence | 32.5 | 8.1 |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 Max Thinking has the strongest reasoning profile with a 32.5 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3 Max Thinking
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
