Model Comparison
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
vs. R1 1776
Comparing 2 AI models · 11 benchmarks · Alibaba, Perplexity
Recommended Pick
Pe R1 1776 4 metric wins Strongest on: Input price, Output price, TTFT
Lowest Price
R1 1776
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
56.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
19.5 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
R1 1776 is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) leads R1 1776 by 2.9 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
R1 1776 wins 4 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
R1 1776
Perplexity
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) | Top Pick Pe R1 1776 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.50/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $6.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.88/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Perplexity |
| Release Date | Sep 11, 2025 | Feb 18, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 179.6 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1193ms | — |
| Latency | 12329ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 56.6 | 53.7 |
| Intelligence | 26.7 | 12.0 |
| Coding | 19.5 | — |
| Math | 84.3 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 75.9% | — |
| MMLU Pro | 82.4% | — |
| HLE | 11.7% | — |
| LiveCodeBench | 78.4% | — |
| MATH 500 | — | 95.4% |
| AIME 2025 | 84.3% | — |
| SciCode | 38.8% | — |
| LCR | 60.3% | — |
| IFBench | 60.7% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 41.5% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 9.8% | — |
Key Takeaways
R1 1776 offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 56.6 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) reaches a 19.5 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
R1 1776
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
