Model Comparison
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
vs. M (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Sarvam
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)2 metric winsStrongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
M (Reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
16.9 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
17.4 coding index
Differences That Matter
Price gap
M (Reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) leads M (Reasoning) by 14.3 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) wins 2 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
M (Reasoning)
Sarvam
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Processing terms vary by selected model. Review the current Privacy Policy and DPA before using sensitive data.
OpenAI-compatible inference
Choose from the current model catalog. Processing terms vary by selected model and service.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) | Sa M (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.15/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.20/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.41/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Sarvam |
| Release Date | Sep 11, 2025 | May 23, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 187.2 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 2280ms | — |
| Latency | 12960ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 16.9 | 2.6 |
| Intelligence | 16.9 | 2.6 |
| Coding | 17.4 | — |
Key Takeaways
M (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 16.9 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) reaches a 17.4 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
M (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
