Model Comparison
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
vs. Trinity Large Thinking
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Alibaba, Arcee AI
Recommended Pick
ArTrinity Large Thinking8 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Output price, Throughput
Best Value
Trinity Large Thinking
100.0 value score
18.7 reasoning / $0.41/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
$0.15/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Trinity Large Thinking
18.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Trinity Large Thinking
25.8 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Trinity Large Thinking has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) is 1.7x cheaper on input tokens than Trinity Large Thinking.
Speed gap
Trinity Large Thinking generates about 1.7x as many tokens per second as Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Trinity Large Thinking leads Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) by 1.8 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Trinity Large Thinking leads Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) by 8.4 points on coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Trinity Large Thinking
Arcee AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Processing terms vary by selected model. Review the current Privacy Policy and DPA before using sensitive data.
OpenAI-compatible inference
Choose from the current model catalog. Processing terms vary by selected model and service.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) | Top Pick Ar Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.15/1M | $0.25/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.20/1M | $0.90/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.41/1M | $0.41/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Arcee AI |
| Release Date | Sep 11, 2025 | Apr 1, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 187.2 tok/s | 325.9 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2280ms | 1190ms |
| Latency | 12960ms | 7320ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 90.4 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 16.9 | 18.7 |
| Intelligence | 16.9 | 18.7 |
| Coding | 17.4 | 25.8 |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.15/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Trinity Large Thinking has the strongest reasoning profile with a 18.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Trinity Large Thinking reaches a 25.8 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Trinity Large Thinking
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
