Model Comparison
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct
vs. Tri-21B-think Preview
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Alibaba, Trillion Labs
Recommended Pick
Tr Tri-21B-think Preview 11 metric wins Strongest on: Input price, Output price, TTFT
Lowest Price
Tri-21B-think Preview
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct
36.5 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Tri-21B-think Preview
7.4 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Tri-21B-think Preview is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct.
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct leads Tri-21B-think Preview by 10.0 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Tri-21B-think Preview leads Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct by 0.2 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Tri-21B-think Preview wins 11 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Tri-21B-think Preview
Trillion Labs
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct | Top Pick Tr Tri-21B-think Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.25/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.97/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.43/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Trillion Labs |
| Release Date | Sep 22, 2025 | Feb 10, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 107.7 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1004ms | — |
| Latency | 1004ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 36.5 | 26.5 |
| Intelligence | 10.7 | 20.0 |
| Coding | 7.2 | 7.4 |
| Math | 52.3 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 62.0% | 53.8% |
| MMLU Pro | 72.5% | — |
| HLE | 5.1% | 5.7% |
| LiveCodeBench | 42.2% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 52.3% | — |
| SciCode | 18.6% | 17.8% |
| LCR | 0.0% | 14.7% |
| IFBench | 31.2% | 47.1% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 16.4% | 93.3% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 1.5% | 2.3% |
Key Takeaways
Tri-21B-think Preview offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct has the strongest reasoning profile with a 36.5 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Tri-21B-think Preview reaches a 7.4 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Tri-21B-think Preview
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
