Model Comparison
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B (Reasoning)
vs. Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Alibaba, ByteDance Seed
Recommended Pick
AlQwen3 VL 235B A22B (Reasoning)12 metric winsStrongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence, Math
Best Value
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
100.0 value score
54.1 reasoning / $0.30/1M
Lowest Price
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
$0.21/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B (Reasoning)
57.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct is 3.3x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B (Reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B (Reasoning) leads Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct by 3.3 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B (Reasoning) wins 12 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence, Math, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
ByteDance Seed
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3 VL 235B A22B (Reasoning) | By Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.70/1M | $0.21/1M |
| Output Cost | $8.40/1M | $0.57/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.63/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | ByteDance Seed |
| Release Date | Sep 23, 2025 | Aug 20, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 12.1 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 57.3 | 54.1 |
| Intelligence | 20.9 | 18.5 |
| Math | 88.3 | 84.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 77.2% | 72.6% |
| MMLU Pro | 83.6% | 81.5% |
| HLE | 11.9% | 9.9% |
| LiveCodeBench | 64.6% | 76.5% |
| AIME 2025 | 88.3% | 84.7% |
| SciCode | 39.9% | 36.5% |
| LCR | 63.0% | 60.0% |
| IFBench | 56.5% | 41.9% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 54.1% | 49.4% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 11.4% | 6.8% |
Key Takeaways
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct offers the best value at $0.21/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 57.3 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B (Reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
