Model Comparison
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
vs. Solar Pro 4
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Alibaba, Upstage
Recommended Pick
UpSolar Pro 47 metric winsStrongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Best Value
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
100.0 value score
46.1 reasoning / $0.35/1M
Lowest Price
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
$0.20/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Solar Pro 4
53.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Solar Pro 4
52.7 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 1.5x cheaper on input tokens than Solar Pro 4.
Reasoning gap
Solar Pro 4 leads Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct by 7.2 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Solar Pro 4 wins 7 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Pro 4
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct | Top Pick Up Solar Pro 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.20/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.80/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.35/1M | $0.52/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Upstage |
| Release Date | Oct 3, 2025 | Aug 6, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 57.6 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1311ms |
| Latency | — | 36013ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 77.1 |
| Reasoning Score | 46.1 | 53.3 |
| Intelligence | 9.9 | 41.6 |
| Coding | — | 52.7 |
| Math | 72.3 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 69.5% | 89.1% |
| MMLU Pro | 76.4% | — |
| HLE | 6.3% | 29.2% |
| LiveCodeBench | 47.6% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 72.3% | — |
| SciCode | 30.8% | 43.6% |
| LCR | 27.3% | 70.7% |
| IFBench | 33.1% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 19.0% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 6.1% | — |
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct offers the best value at $0.20/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Solar Pro 4 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 53.3 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Solar Pro 4 reaches a 52.7 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Solar Pro 4
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
