Model Comparison
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning)
vs. Solar Pro 3
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Alibaba, Upstage
Recommended Pick
Up Solar Pro 3 11 metric wins Strongest on: Input price, Output price, TTFT
Lowest Price
Solar Pro 3
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning)
53.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Solar Pro 3
13.3 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Solar Pro 3 is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning) leads Solar Pro 3 by 16.9 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Solar Pro 3 leads Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning) by 0.2 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Solar Pro 3 wins 11 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Pro 3
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning) | Top Pick Up Solar Pro 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.20/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.75/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.34/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Upstage |
| Release Date | Oct 3, 2025 | Apr 6, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 124.3 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1083ms | — |
| Latency | 17177ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 53.0 | 36.1 |
| Intelligence | 19.7 | 25.9 |
| Coding | 13.1 | 13.3 |
| Math | 82.3 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 72.0% | 72.4% |
| MMLU Pro | 80.7% | — |
| HLE | 8.7% | 10.1% |
| LiveCodeBench | 69.7% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 82.3% | — |
| SciCode | 28.8% | 24.7% |
| LCR | 40.7% | 27.0% |
| IFBench | 45.1% | 71.2% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 19.9% | 86.3% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 5.3% | 7.6% |
Key Takeaways
Solar Pro 3 offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 53.0 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Solar Pro 3 reaches a 13.3 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Solar Pro 3
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
