Model Comparison
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning)
vs. Tri-21B-think Preview
Comparing 2 AI models · 10 benchmarks · Alibaba, Trillion Labs
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning) 8 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Coding
Lowest Price
Tri-21B-think Preview
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning)
53.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning)
13.1 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Tri-21B-think Preview is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning) leads Tri-21B-think Preview by 26.5 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning) leads Tri-21B-think Preview by 5.7 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning) wins 8 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Coding, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Tri-21B-think Preview
Trillion Labs
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning) | Tr Tri-21B-think Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.20/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.75/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.34/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Trillion Labs |
| Release Date | Oct 3, 2025 | Feb 10, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 124.0 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1083ms | — |
| Latency | 17214ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 53.0 | 26.5 |
| Intelligence | 19.7 | 20.0 |
| Coding | 13.1 | 7.4 |
| Math | 82.3 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 72.0% | 53.8% |
| MMLU Pro | 80.7% | — |
| HLE | 8.7% | 5.7% |
| LiveCodeBench | 69.7% | — |
| AIME 2025 | 82.3% | — |
| SciCode | 28.8% | 17.8% |
| LCR | 40.7% | 14.7% |
| IFBench | 45.1% | 47.1% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 19.9% | 93.3% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 5.3% | 2.3% |
Key Takeaways
Tri-21B-think Preview offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 53.0 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning) reaches a 13.1 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Tri-21B-think Preview
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
