Model Comparison
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
vs. Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Alibaba, Upstage
Recommended Pick
Al Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct 14 metric wins Strongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Lowest Price
Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
45.4 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
15.6 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.
Reasoning gap
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct leads Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning) by 7.9 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct leads Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning) by 4.3 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct wins 14 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, Coding.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning)
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct | Up Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.70/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $2.80/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.22/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Upstage |
| Release Date | Oct 21, 2025 | Jul 9, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 76.1 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1173ms | — |
| Latency | 1173ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 45.4 | 37.6 |
| Intelligence | 17.2 | 13.6 |
| Coding | 15.6 | 11.3 |
| Math | 68.3 | 30.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 67.1% | 56.1% |
| MMLU Pro | 79.1% | 75.0% |
| HLE | 6.3% | 3.8% |
| LiveCodeBench | 51.4% | 42.4% |
| MATH 500 | — | 88.9% |
| AIME 2025 | 68.3% | 30.0% |
| AIME (Original) | — | 40.7% |
| SciCode | 30.1% | 24.8% |
| LCR | 31.3% | 0.0% |
| IFBench | 39.2% | 33.7% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 29.2% | 31.9% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 8.3% | 4.5% |
Key Takeaways
Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct has the strongest reasoning profile with a 45.4 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct reaches a 15.6 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
