Model Comparison
QwQ 32B
vs. Reka Flash 3
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Alibaba, Reka AI
Recommended Pick
Al QwQ 32B 12 metric wins Strongest on: TTFT, Reasoning, Intelligence
Best Value
Reka Flash 3
100.0 value score
39.3 reasoning / $0.35/1M
Lowest Price
Reka Flash 3
$0.20/1M input price
Best Reasoning
QwQ 32B
45.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Reka Flash 3
8.9 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Reka Flash 3 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Reka Flash 3 is 3.3x cheaper on input tokens than QwQ 32B.
Speed gap
Reka Flash 3 generates about 2.9x as many tokens per second as QwQ 32B.
Reasoning gap
QwQ 32B leads Reka Flash 3 by 6.3 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
QwQ 32B wins 12 measurable categories, including TTFT, Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
QwQ 32B
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Reka Flash 3
Reka AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Al QwQ 32B | Re Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.66/1M | $0.20/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.00/1M | $0.80/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.74/1M | $0.35/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Reka AI |
| Release Date | Mar 5, 2025 | Mar 10, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 30.9 tok/s | 90.3 tok/s |
| TTFT | 431ms | 2148ms |
| Latency | 81150ms | 24298ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 54.5 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 45.6 | 39.3 |
| Intelligence | 19.7 | 9.5 |
| Coding | — | 8.9 |
| Math | 29.0 | 33.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 59.3% | 52.9% |
| MMLU Pro | 76.4% | 66.9% |
| HLE | 8.2% | 5.1% |
| LiveCodeBench | 63.1% | 43.5% |
| MATH 500 | 95.7% | 89.3% |
| AIME 2025 | 29.0% | 33.7% |
| AIME (Original) | 78.0% | 51.0% |
| SciCode | 35.8% | 26.7% |
| LCR | 25.0% | 0.0% |
| IFBench | 38.8% | 30.4% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 0.0% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 0.0% |
Key Takeaways
Reka Flash 3 offers the best value at $0.20/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
QwQ 32B has the strongest reasoning profile with a 45.6 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Reka Flash 3 reaches a 8.9 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
QwQ 32B
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Reka Flash 3
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
