Model Comparison
QwQ 32B
vs. Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · Alibaba, Upstage
Recommended Pick
Up Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning) 10 metric wins Strongest on: Input price, Output price, TTFT
Lowest Price
Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning)
54.1 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning)
12.1 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than QwQ 32B.
Reasoning gap
Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning) leads QwQ 32B by 8.6 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning) wins 10 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
QwQ 32B
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning)
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Full Comparison
| Metric | Al QwQ 32B | Top Pick Up Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.66/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.00/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.74/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Alibaba | Upstage |
| Release Date | Mar 5, 2025 | Jul 9, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 30.9 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 431ms | — |
| Latency | 81150ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 45.6 | 54.1 |
| Intelligence | 19.7 | 14.9 |
| Coding | — | 12.1 |
| Math | 29.0 | 61.3 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 59.3% | 68.7% |
| MMLU Pro | 76.4% | 80.5% |
| HLE | 8.2% | 7.0% |
| LiveCodeBench | 63.1% | 61.6% |
| MATH 500 | 95.7% | 96.7% |
| AIME 2025 | 29.0% | 61.3% |
| AIME (Original) | 78.0% | 69.0% |
| SciCode | 35.8% | 30.2% |
| LCR | 25.0% | 0.0% |
| IFBench | 38.8% | 37.1% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 28.1% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 3.0% |
Key Takeaways
Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M, making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 54.1 reasoning score, combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning) reaches a 12.1 coding index, making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens, suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
QwQ 32B
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Solar Pro 2 (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
