Model Comparison
R1 1776
vs. Beam 1.0
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Perplexity, Reflection
Lowest Price
Beam 1.0
$0.40/1M input price
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
R1 1776
Perplexity
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Beam 1.0
Reflection
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Pe R1 1776 | Re Beam 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | — | $0.40/1M |
| Output Cost | — | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.60/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Perplexity | Reflection |
| Release Date | Feb 18, 2025 | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 388.7 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 700ms |
| Latency | — | 5850ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | — | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | — | 17.7 |
| Intelligence | — | 17.7 |
Key Takeaways
Beam 1.0 offers the best value at $0.40/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
R1 1776
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Beam 1.0
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
