Model Comparison
Beam 1.0
vs. Solar Pro 4
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Reflection, Upstage
Recommended Pick
ReBeam 1.03 metric winsStrongest on: Throughput, TTFT, Latency
Lowest Price
Solar Pro 4
$0.30/1M input price
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Solar Pro 4 is 1.3x cheaper on input tokens than Beam 1.0.
Speed gap
Beam 1.0 generates about 4.7x as many tokens per second as Solar Pro 4.
Top-pick rationale
Beam 1.0 wins 3 measurable categories, including Throughput, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Beam 1.0
Reflection
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Pro 4
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Re Beam 1.0 | Up Solar Pro 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.40/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.20/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.60/1M | $0.52/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Reflection | Upstage |
| Release Date | Oct 16, 2026 | Aug 6, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 394.7 tok/s | 84.0 tok/s |
| TTFT | 710ms | 1910ms |
| Latency | 5770ms | 25720ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 17.7 | — |
| Intelligence | 17.7 | — |
Key Takeaways
Solar Pro 4 offers the best value at $0.30/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Beam 1.0
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Solar Pro 4
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
