Model Comparison
Reka Flash (Sep '24)
vs. M (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 11 benchmarks · Reka AI, Sarvam
Recommended Pick
SaM (Reasoning)4 metric winsStrongest on: Input price, Output price, Reasoning
Lowest Price
M (Reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
M (Reasoning)
30.5 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
M (Reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Reka Flash (Sep '24).
Reasoning gap
M (Reasoning) leads Reka Flash (Sep '24) by 1.0 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
M (Reasoning) wins 4 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, Reasoning, MATH 500.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Reka Flash (Sep '24)
Reka AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
M (Reasoning)
Sarvam
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Re Reka Flash (Sep '24) | Top Pick Sa M (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.20/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.80/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.35/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Reka AI | Sarvam |
| Release Date | Oct 4, 2024 | May 23, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 29.4 | 30.5 |
| Intelligence | 6.0 | 2.6 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | — | 41.6% |
| MMLU Pro | — | 69.6% |
| HLE | — | 3.1% |
| LiveCodeBench | — | 29.5% |
| MATH 500 | 52.9% | 84.7% |
| AIME (Original) | — | 20.3% |
| SciCode | — | 17.8% |
| LCR | — | 0.0% |
| IFBench | — | 31.8% |
| TAU-bench v2 | — | 0.0% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 2.3% |
Key Takeaways
M (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
M (Reasoning) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 30.5 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Reka Flash (Sep '24)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
M (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
