Model Comparison

105B (High)
vs. Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)

Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Sarvam, Anthropic

Recommended Pick

105B (High)6 metric wins

Strongest on: Input price, Output price, Blended price

Lowest Price

105B (High)

$0.04/1M input price

Differences That Matter

Price gap

105B (High) is 190.5x cheaper on input tokens than Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback).

Speed gap

105B (High) generates about 1.5x as many tokens per second as Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback).

Top-pick rationale

105B (High) wins 6 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, Blended price, Throughput.

Live compare

Response Face-Off

Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.

10 comparisons left in 24h

105B (High)

Sarvam

Waiting

TTFT

—

Time

—

tok/s

—

Tokens

—

Cost

—

Waiting

Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)

Anthropic

Waiting

TTFT

—

Time

—

tok/s

—

Tokens

—

Cost

—

Waiting

Which answer was more useful?

Secure AI Chat made in Europe

Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.

Chat for free

EU-hosted open models, one API

Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.

Get API access

Full Comparison

Metric	Top Pick Sa 105B (High) Sarvam	An Claude Fable 5.2 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) Anthropic
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input Cost	$0.04/1M	$8.00/1M
Output Cost	$0.17/1M	$40.00/1M
Blended (3:1)	$0.07/1M	$16.00/1M
Specifications
Organization	Sarvam	Anthropic
Release Date	Mar 6, 2026	Nov 9, 2026
Performance & Speed
Throughput	131.6 tok/s	86.0 tok/s
TTFT	1600ms	97290ms
Latency	16800ms	97290ms
Composite Indices
Value Score	—	100.0
Reasoning Score	—	62.2
Intelligence	—	62.2