Model Comparison
105B (high)
vs. Solar Mini
Comparing 2 AI models · 8 benchmarks · Sarvam, Upstage
Recommended Pick
Sa105B (high)7 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Blended price
Best Value
105B (high)
100.0 value score
31.9 reasoning / $0.07/1M
Lowest Price
105B (high)
$0.04/1M input price
Best Reasoning
105B (high)
31.9 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
105B (high) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
105B (high) is 3.6x cheaper on input tokens than Solar Mini.
Speed gap
105B (high) generates about 1.6x as many tokens per second as Solar Mini.
Reasoning gap
105B (high) leads Solar Mini by 12.3 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
105B (high) wins 7 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Blended price, Throughput.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
105B (high)
Sarvam
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Mini
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Sa 105B (high) | Up Solar Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.04/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.17/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.07/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Sarvam | Upstage |
| Release Date | Mar 6, 2026 | Jan 25, 2024 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 126.7 tok/s | 77.9 tok/s |
| TTFT | 1173ms | 750ms |
| Latency | 16961ms | 750ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 30.4 |
| Reasoning Score | 31.9 | 19.7 |
| Intelligence | 11.9 | 6.2 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 73.8% | — |
| HLE | 10.1% | — |
| MATH 500 | — | 33.1% |
| SciCode | 26.4% | — |
| LCR | 0.0% | — |
| IFBench | 34.4% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 46.8% | 20.2% |
| TerminalBench Hard | 1.5% | — |
Key Takeaways
105B (high) offers the best value at $0.04/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
105B (high) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 31.9 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
105B (high)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Solar Mini
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
