Model Comparison
30B (high)
vs. Solar Pro 4
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Sarvam, Upstage
Recommended Pick
UpSolar Pro 47 metric winsStrongest on: Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence
Best Value
30B (high)
100.0 value score
25.7 reasoning / $0.05/1M
Lowest Price
30B (high)
$0.03/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Solar Pro 4
53.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Solar Pro 4
52.7 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
30B (high) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
30B (high) is 11.5x cheaper on input tokens than Solar Pro 4.
Reasoning gap
Solar Pro 4 leads 30B (high) by 27.6 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Solar Pro 4 wins 7 measurable categories, including Throughput, Reasoning, Intelligence, GPQA.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
30B (high)
Sarvam
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Solar Pro 4
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Sa 30B (high) | Top Pick Up Solar Pro 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.03/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.11/1M | $1.20/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.05/1M | $0.52/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Sarvam | Upstage |
| Release Date | Mar 6, 2026 | Aug 6, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 66.3 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 1239ms |
| Latency | — | 31422ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 18.5 |
| Reasoning Score | 25.7 | 53.3 |
| Intelligence | 6.4 | 41.6 |
| Coding | — | 52.7 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 63.3% | 89.1% |
| HLE | 7.5% | 29.2% |
| SciCode | 19.2% | 43.6% |
| LCR | 0.0% | 70.7% |
| IFBench | 26.5% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 34.5% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 2.3% | — |
Key Takeaways
30B (high) offers the best value at $0.03/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Solar Pro 4 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 53.3 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Solar Pro 4 reaches a 52.7 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
30B (high)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Solar Pro 4
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
