Model Comparison
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
vs. Sonar Reasoning
Comparing 2 AI models · 12 benchmarks · ByteDance Seed, Perplexity
Recommended Pick
PeSonar Reasoning5 metric winsStrongest on: Input price, Output price, TTFT
Lowest Price
Sonar Reasoning
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Sonar Reasoning
60.8 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Sonar Reasoning is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct.
Reasoning gap
Sonar Reasoning leads Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct by 6.9 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Sonar Reasoning wins 5 measurable categories, including Input price, Output price, TTFT, Latency.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
ByteDance Seed
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Sonar Reasoning
Perplexity
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | By Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct | Top Pick Pe Sonar Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.21/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.57/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.30/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | ByteDance Seed | Perplexity |
| Release Date | Aug 20, 2025 | Jan 28, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 36.5 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1491ms | — |
| Latency | 56289ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 53.9 | 60.8 |
| Intelligence | 18.3 | 11.7 |
| Math | 84.7 | — |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 72.6% | 62.3% |
| MMLU Pro | 81.5% | — |
| HLE | 9.1% | — |
| LiveCodeBench | 76.5% | — |
| MATH 500 | — | 92.1% |
| AIME 2025 | 84.7% | — |
| AIME (Original) | — | 77.0% |
| SciCode | 36.5% | — |
| LCR | 57.7% | — |
| IFBench | 41.9% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 49.4% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 6.8% | — |
Key Takeaways
Sonar Reasoning offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Sonar Reasoning has the strongest reasoning profile with a 60.8 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Sonar Reasoning
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
