Model Comparison
Solar Mini
vs. Step 3.5 Flash 2603
Comparing 2 AI models · 8 benchmarks · Upstage, StepFun
Recommended Pick
StStep 3.5 Flash 26036 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Throughput
Best Value
Step 3.5 Flash 2603
100.0 value score
43.7 reasoning / $0.15/1M
Lowest Price
Step 3.5 Flash 2603
$0.10/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Step 3.5 Flash 2603
43.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Step 3.5 Flash 2603 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 1.5x cheaper on input tokens than Solar Mini.
Speed gap
Step 3.5 Flash 2603 generates about 2.6x as many tokens per second as Solar Mini.
Reasoning gap
Step 3.5 Flash 2603 leads Solar Mini by 24.1 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Step 3.5 Flash 2603 wins 6 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Throughput, Reasoning.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Solar Mini
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Step 3.5 Flash 2603
StepFun
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Up Solar Mini | Top Pick St Step 3.5 Flash 2603 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.15/1M | $0.10/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.15/1M | $0.30/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15/1M | $0.15/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Upstage | StepFun |
| Release Date | Jan 25, 2024 | Apr 2, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 77.9 tok/s | 201.0 tok/s |
| TTFT | 750ms | 788ms |
| Latency | 750ms | 10736ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 45.0 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 19.7 | 43.7 |
| Intelligence | 6.2 | 26.0 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | — | 82.6% |
| HLE | — | 22.6% |
| MATH 500 | 33.1% | — |
| SciCode | — | 38.5% |
| LCR | — | 54.3% |
| IFBench | — | 66.5% |
| TAU-bench v2 | 20.2% | 87.4% |
| TerminalBench Hard | — | 32.6% |
Key Takeaways
Step 3.5 Flash 2603 offers the best value at $0.10/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Step 3.5 Flash 2603 has the strongest reasoning profile with a 43.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Solar Mini
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
