Model Comparison

Solar Open 100B (Reasoning)
vs. Step 3.5 Flash 2603

Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Upstage, StepFun

Lowest Price

StepFun logo

Step 3.5 Flash 2603

$0.10/1M input price

Live compare

Response Face-Off

Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.

10 comparisons left in 24h
Upstage logo

Solar Open 100B (Reasoning)

Upstage

Waiting

TTFT

—

Time

—

tok/s

—

Tokens

—

Cost

—

Waiting
StepFun logo

Step 3.5 Flash 2603

StepFun

Waiting

TTFT

—

Time

—

tok/s

—

Tokens

—

Cost

—

Waiting

Which answer was more useful?

Secure AI Chat made in Europe

Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.

EU-hosted open models, one API

Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.

Full Comparison

Metric
Upstage logoSolar Open 100B (Reasoning)
Upstage
StepFun logoStep 3.5 Flash 2603
StepFun
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input Cost—$0.10/1M
Output Cost—$0.30/1M
Blended (3:1)—$0.15/1M
Specifications
OrganizationUpstageStepFun
Release DateDec 17, 2025Apr 2, 2026
Performance & Speed
Throughput—150.7 tok/s
TTFT—3270ms
Latency—16540ms

Key Takeaways

Step 3.5 Flash 2603 offers the best value at $0.10/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.

All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.

When to Choose Each Model

Upstage logo

Solar Open 100B (Reasoning)

  • General-purpose AI
  • Versatile applications
StepFun logo

Step 3.5 Flash 2603

  • Cost-sensitive applications
  • High-volume processing