Model Comparison
Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning)
vs. Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Upstage, Allen Institute for AI
Recommended Pick
Strongest on: Reasoning, Intelligence
Best Reasoning
Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B
8.1 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Differences That Matter
Reasoning gap
Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B leads Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning) by 0.5 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B wins 2 measurable categories, including Reasoning, Intelligence.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning)
Upstage
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B
Allen Institute for AI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Processing terms vary by selected model. Review the current Privacy Policy and DPA before using sensitive data.
OpenAI-compatible inference
Choose from the current model catalog. Processing terms vary by selected model and service.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Up Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning) | Top Pick Al Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | — | — |
| Output Cost | — | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Upstage | Allen Institute for AI |
| Release Date | Jul 9, 2025 | Jan 30, 2025 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | — |
| TTFT | — | — |
| Latency | — | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Reasoning Score | 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Intelligence | 7.6 | 8.1 |
Key Takeaways
Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B has the strongest reasoning profile with a 8.1 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Solar Pro 2 (Non-reasoning)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Llama 3.1 Tulu3 405B
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis