Model Comparison
Step 3.7 Flash
vs. Step 5 Preview
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · StepFun
Recommended Pick
StStep 3.7 Flash7 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Step 3.7 Flash
100.0 value score
19.5 reasoning / $0.44/1M
Lowest Price
Step 3.7 Flash
$0.20/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Step 5 Preview
43.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Step 3.7 Flash
39.6 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
Step 3.7 Flash has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Step 3.7 Flash is 5.0x cheaper on input tokens than Step 5 Preview.
Speed gap
Step 3.7 Flash generates about 2.1x as many tokens per second as Step 5 Preview.
Reasoning gap
Step 5 Preview leads Step 3.7 Flash by 24.2 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Step 3.7 Flash wins 7 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Step 5 Preview
StepFun
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick St Step 3.7 Flash | St Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.20/1M | $1.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.15/1M | $2.70/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.44/1M | $1.43/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | StepFun | StepFun |
| Release Date | May 29, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 194.3 tok/s | 91.5 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2560ms | 3100ms |
| Latency | 12850ms | 24960ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 68.8 |
| Reasoning Score | 19.5 | 43.7 |
| Intelligence | 19.5 | 43.7 |
| Coding | 39.6 | — |
Key Takeaways
Step 3.7 Flash offers the best value at $0.20/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Step 5 Preview has the strongest reasoning profile with a 43.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Step 3.7 Flash reaches a 39.6 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Step 3.7 Flash
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Code generation
- Software development
Step 5 Preview
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
