Model Comparison
Hy4
vs. Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Tencent, Anthropic
Recommended Pick
TeHy44 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Hy4
100.0 value score
34.6 reasoning / $1.25/1M
Lowest Price
Hy4
$0.83/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback)
64.6 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Differences That Matter
Best value
Hy4 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Hy4 is 9.6x cheaper on input tokens than Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback).
Reasoning gap
Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) leads Hy4 by 30.0 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Hy4 wins 4 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Hy4
Tencent
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Te Hy4 | An Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.83/1M | $8.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $2.50/1M | $40.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.25/1M | $16.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Tencent | Anthropic |
| Release Date | Nov 3, 2026 | Nov 9, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 94.0 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 249300ms |
| Latency | — | 249300ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 14.6 |
| Reasoning Score | 34.6 | 64.6 |
| Intelligence | 34.6 | 64.6 |
Key Takeaways
Hy4 offers the best value at $0.83/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 64.6 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Hy4
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
