Model Comparison
Hy4
vs. Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Tencent, Google
Recommended Pick
TeHy47 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Hy4
100.0 value score
34.6 reasoning / $1.25/1M
Lowest Price
Hy4
$0.83/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
60.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Differences That Matter
Best value
Hy4 has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Hy4 is 4.8x cheaper on input tokens than Gemini 4 Carbon (High).
Reasoning gap
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) leads Hy4 by 25.4 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
Hy4 wins 7 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Hy4
Tencent
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Chat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in.
EU-hosted open models, one API
Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Te Hy4 | Go Gemini 4 Carbon (High) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.83/1M | $4.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $2.50/1M | $20.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.25/1M | $8.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Tencent | |
| Release Date | Nov 3, 2026 | Oct 28, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 93.8 tok/s | 92.1 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2360ms | 122720ms |
| Latency | 23690ms | 122720ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 27.1 |
| Reasoning Score | 34.6 | 60.0 |
| Intelligence | 34.6 | 60.0 |
Key Takeaways
Hy4 offers the best value at $0.83/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 60.0 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Hy4
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Recommended Comparisons
Popular alternatives
