AI Model Ranking (LLM Leaderboard)
Cheapest AI Models
Most affordable language models sorted by price per token
| Model AI model name and provider organization | Price/1M Cost per 1 million tokens β input (text you send) / output (text the model generates) |
MMLU-Pro
Massive Multitask Language Understanding (Professional) - tests broad knowledge across 14 subjects including STEM, humanities, and social sciences |
GPQA
Graduate-level Google-Proof Q&A benchmark - tests PhD-level reasoning and advanced intelligence |
AIME 2025
American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2025 - tests advanced mathematical problem-solving ability | Release When the model was released - newer models may have more capabilities | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 Qwen3.5 0.8B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.01 / $0.05 | - | 11.1% | - | Mar 2, 2026 | |
| #2 Qwen3.5 0.8B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.01 / $0.05 | - | 23.6% | - | Mar 2, 2026 | |
| #3 Qwen3.5 2B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.02 / $0.10 | - | 45.6% | - | Mar 2, 2026 | |
| #4 Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.02 / $0.10 | - | 43.8% | - | Mar 2, 2026 | |
| #5 Gemma 3n E4B Instruct by Google | $0.02 / $0.04 | 48.8% | 29.6% | 14.3% | Jun 26, 2025 | |
| #6 LFM2 24B A2B by Liquid AI | $0.03 / $0.12 | - | 47.4% | - | Feb 25, 2026 | |
| #7 Qwen3.5 4B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.03 / $0.15 | - | 77.1% | - | Mar 2, 2026 | |
| #8 Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.03 / $0.15 | - | 71.2% | - | Mar 2, 2026 | |
| #9 Granite 3.3 8B (Non-reasoning) by IBM | $0.03 / $0.25 | 46.8% | 33.8% | 6.7% | Apr 16, 2025 | |
| #10 Nova Micro by Amazon | $0.04 / $0.14 | 53.1% | 35.8% | 6.0% | Dec 3, 2024 | |
| #11 NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Reasoning) by NVIDIA | $0.04 / $0.16 | 74.2% | 57.0% | 69.7% | Aug 18, 2025 | |
| #12 Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.04 / $0.20 | - | 78.6% | - | Mar 2, 2026 | |
| #13 Llama 3 Instruct 8B by Meta | $0.04 / $0.14 | 40.5% | 29.6% | - | Apr 18, 2024 | |
| #14 NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) by NVIDIA | $0.05 / $0.20 | 57.9% | 39.9% | 13.3% | Dec 15, 2025 | |
| #15 NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 9B V2 (Non-reasoning) by NVIDIA | $0.05 / $0.20 | 73.9% | 55.7% | 62.3% | Aug 18, 2025 | |
| #16 GPT-5 nano (minimal) by OpenAI | $0.05 / $0.40 | 55.6% | 42.8% | 27.3% | Aug 7, 2025 | |
| #17 GPT-5 nano (high) by OpenAI | $0.05 / $0.40 | 78.0% | 67.6% | 83.7% | Aug 7, 2025 | |
| #18 GPT-5 nano (medium) by OpenAI | $0.05 / $0.40 | 77.2% | 67.0% | 78.3% | Aug 7, 2025 | |
| #19 Llama 2 Chat 7B by Meta | $0.05 / $0.25 | 16.4% | 22.7% | - | Jul 18, 2023 | |
| #20 Qwen2.5 Turbo by Alibaba | $0.05 / $0.20 | 63.3% | 41.0% | - | Nov 18, 2024 | |
| #21 gpt-oss-20B (high) by OpenAI | $0.06 / $0.20 | 74.8% | 68.8% | 89.3% | Aug 5, 2025 | |
| #22 gpt-oss-20B (low) by OpenAI | $0.06 / $0.20 | 71.8% | 61.1% | 62.3% | Aug 5, 2025 | |
| #23 NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA | $0.06 / $0.24 | 79.4% | 75.7% | 91.0% | Dec 15, 2025 | |
| #24 Granite 4.0 H Small by IBM | $0.06 / $0.25 | 62.4% | 41.6% | 13.7% | Sep 22, 2025 | |
| #25 Devstral Small (May '25) by Mistral | $0.06 / $0.12 | 63.2% | 43.4% | - | May 21, 2025 | |
| #26 Nova Lite by Amazon | $0.06 / $0.24 | 59.0% | 43.3% | 7.0% | Dec 3, 2024 | |
| #27 Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.07 / $0.17 | - | 80.6% | - | Mar 2, 2026 | |
| #28 GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) by Z AI | $0.07 / $0.40 | - | 58.1% | - | Jan 19, 2026 | |
| #29 GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) by Z AI | $0.07 / $0.40 | - | 45.2% | - | Jan 19, 2026 | |
| #30 Llama 3.2 Instruct 3B by Meta | $0.09 / $0.09 | 34.7% | 25.5% | 3.3% | Sep 25, 2024 | |
| #31 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Reasoning) by Google | $0.10 / $0.40 | 80.8% | 70.9% | 68.7% | Sep 8, 2025 | |
| #32 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) by Google | $0.10 / $0.40 | 79.6% | 65.1% | 46.7% | Sep 25, 2025 | |
| #33 Ministral 3 3B by Mistral | $0.10 / $0.10 | 52.4% | 35.8% | 22.0% | Dec 2, 2025 | |
| #34 Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Non-reasoning) by NVIDIA | $0.10 / $0.40 | 69.2% | 48.1% | 8.0% | Jul 25, 2025 | |
| #35 Llama Nemotron Super 49B v1.5 (Reasoning) by NVIDIA | $0.10 / $0.40 | 81.4% | 74.8% | 76.7% | Jul 25, 2025 | |
| #36 Step 3.5 Flash by StepFun | $0.10 / $0.30 | - | 83.1% | - | Feb 2, 2026 | |
| #37 Olmo 3 7B Instruct by Allen Institute for AI | $0.10 / $0.20 | 52.2% | 40.0% | 41.3% | Nov 20, 2025 | |
| #38 MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) by Xiaomi | $0.10 / $0.30 | - | 83.5% | - | Dec 16, 2025 | |
| #39 MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) by Xiaomi | $0.10 / $0.30 | 74.4% | 65.6% | 67.7% | Dec 16, 2025 | |
| #40 Apertus 8B Instruct by Swiss AI Initiative | $0.10 / $0.20 | - | 25.6% | - | Sep 2, 2025 | |
| #41 Qwen3.5 Omni Flash by Alibaba | $0.10 / $0.80 | - | 74.2% | - | Mar 30, 2026 | |
| #42 GPT-4.1 nano by OpenAI | $0.10 / $0.40 | 65.7% | 51.2% | 24.0% | Apr 14, 2025 | |
| #43 Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B by Meta | $0.10 / $0.10 | 47.6% | 25.9% | 4.3% | Jul 23, 2024 | |
| #44 Llama 3.2 Instruct 1B by Meta | $0.10 / $0.10 | 20.0% | 19.6% | - | Sep 25, 2024 | |
| #45 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning) by Google | $0.10 / $0.40 | 72.4% | 47.4% | 35.3% | Jun 17, 2025 | |
| #46 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Reasoning) by Google | $0.10 / $0.40 | 75.9% | 62.5% | 53.3% | Jun 17, 2025 | |
| #47 Mistral Small 3 by Mistral | $0.10 / $0.30 | 65.2% | 46.2% | 4.3% | Jan 30, 2025 | |
| #48 Devstral Small (Jul '25) by Mistral | $0.10 / $0.30 | 62.2% | 41.4% | 29.3% | Jul 10, 2025 | |
| #49 Mistral Small 3.1 by Mistral | $0.10 / $0.30 | 65.9% | 45.4% | 3.7% | Mar 17, 2025 | |
| #50 Mistral Small 3.2 by Mistral | $0.10 / $0.30 | 68.1% | 50.5% | 27.0% | Jun 20, 2025 | |
| #51 MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) by Xiaomi | $0.10 / $0.30 | 84.3% | 84.6% | 96.3% | Dec 16, 2025 | |
| #52 Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.11 / $1.26 | 57.0% | 35.6% | 38.7% | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #53 Qwen3 4B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.11 / $1.26 | 69.6% | 52.2% | 22.3% | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #54 Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.11 / $0.42 | 23.1% | 23.1% | 10.3% | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #55 Qwen3 4B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.11 / $0.42 | 58.6% | 39.8% | - | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #56 Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.11 / $1.26 | 34.7% | 23.9% | 18.0% | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #57 Qwen3 1.7B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.11 / $0.42 | 41.1% | 28.3% | 7.3% | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #58 QwQ 32B-Preview by Alibaba | $0.12 / $0.18 | 64.8% | 55.7% | - | Nov 27, 2024 | |
| #59 Phi-4 by Microsoft Azure | $0.13 / $0.50 | 71.4% | 57.5% | 18.0% | Dec 12, 2024 | |
| #60 Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) by Google | $0.13 / $0.40 | - | 79.2% | - | Apr 2, 2026 | |
| #61 Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Non-reasoning) by Nous Research | $0.13 / $0.40 | 66.4% | 49.1% | 11.3% | Aug 27, 2025 | |
| #62 Hermes 4 - Llama-3.1 70B (Reasoning) by Nous Research | $0.13 / $0.40 | 81.1% | 69.9% | 68.7% | Aug 27, 2025 | |
| #63 Ling-flash-2.0 by InclusionAI | $0.14 / $0.57 | 77.7% | 65.7% | 65.3% | Sep 17, 2025 | |
| #64 Ring-flash-2.0 by InclusionAI | $0.14 / $0.57 | 79.3% | 72.5% | 83.7% | Sep 19, 2025 | |
| #65 gpt-oss-120B (high) by OpenAI | $0.15 / $0.60 | 80.8% | 78.2% | 93.4% | Aug 5, 2025 | |
| #66 gpt-oss-120B (low) by OpenAI | $0.15 / $0.60 | 77.5% | 67.2% | 66.7% | Aug 5, 2025 | |
| #67 Ministral 3 8B by Mistral | $0.15 / $0.15 | 64.2% | 47.1% | 31.7% | Dec 2, 2025 | |
| #68 Mistral Small 4 (Non-reasoning) by Mistral | $0.15 / $0.60 | - | 57.1% | - | Mar 16, 2026 | |
| #69 Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) by Mistral | $0.15 / $0.60 | - | 76.9% | - | Mar 16, 2026 | |
| #70 GPT-4o mini by OpenAI | $0.15 / $0.60 | 64.8% | 42.6% | 14.7% | Jul 18, 2024 | |
| #71 Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb '25) by Google | $0.15 / $0.60 | 77.9% | 62.3% | 21.7% | Feb 5, 2025 | |
| #72 Solar Mini by Upstage | $0.15 / $0.15 | - | - | - | Jan 25, 2024 | |
| #73 Llama 3.2 Instruct 11B (Vision) by Meta | $0.16 / $0.16 | 46.4% | 22.1% | 1.7% | Sep 25, 2024 | |
| #74 Llama 4 Scout by Meta | $0.17 / $0.66 | 75.2% | 58.7% | 14.0% | Apr 5, 2025 | |
| #75 Qwen3 8B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.18 / $0.70 | 64.3% | 45.2% | 24.3% | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #76 Qwen3 8B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.18 / $2.10 | 74.3% | 58.9% | 19.0% | Apr 28, 2025 | |
| #77 Qwen3 VL 8B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.18 / $2.10 | 74.9% | 57.9% | 30.7% | Oct 14, 2025 | |
| #78 Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct by Alibaba | $0.18 / $0.70 | 68.6% | 42.7% | 27.3% | Oct 14, 2025 | |
| #79 GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) by OpenAI | $0.20 / $1.25 | - | 81.7% | - | Mar 17, 2026 | |
| #80 GPT-5.4 nano (medium) by OpenAI | $0.20 / $1.25 | - | 76.1% | - | Mar 17, 2026 | |
| #81 GPT-5.4 nano (Non-Reasoning) by OpenAI | $0.20 / $1.25 | - | 55.8% | - | Mar 17, 2026 | |
| #82 Ministral 3 14B by Mistral | $0.20 / $0.20 | 69.3% | 57.2% | 30.0% | Dec 2, 2025 | |
| #83 Grok 4.1 Fast (Non-reasoning) by xAI | $0.20 / $0.50 | 74.3% | 63.7% | 34.3% | Nov 19, 2025 | |
| #84 Grok Code Fast 1 by xAI | $0.20 / $1.50 | 79.3% | 72.7% | 43.3% | Aug 28, 2025 | |
| #85 Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) by xAI | $0.20 / $0.50 | 85.4% | 85.3% | 89.3% | Nov 19, 2025 | |
| #86 NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Reasoning) by NVIDIA | $0.20 / $0.60 | 75.9% | 57.2% | 75.0% | Oct 28, 2025 | |
| #87 NVIDIA Nemotron Nano 12B v2 VL (Non-reasoning) by NVIDIA | $0.20 / $0.60 | 64.9% | 43.9% | 26.7% | Oct 28, 2025 | |
| #88 Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct by Allen Institute for AI | $0.20 / $0.60 | - | 53.9% | - | Jan 13, 2026 | |
| #89 Reka Flash 3 by Reka AI | $0.20 / $0.80 | 66.9% | 52.9% | 33.7% | Mar 10, 2025 | |
| #90 Mistral Small (Sep '24) by Mistral | $0.20 / $0.60 | 52.9% | 38.1% | - | Sep 17, 2024 | |
| #91 Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) by xAI | $0.20 / $0.50 | 85.0% | 84.7% | 89.7% | Sep 19, 2025 | |
| #92 Grok 4 Fast (Non-reasoning) by xAI | $0.20 / $0.50 | 73.0% | 60.6% | 41.3% | Sep 19, 2025 | |
| #93 Reka Flash (Sep '24) by Reka AI | $0.20 / $0.80 | - | - | - | Oct 4, 2024 | |
| #94 GLM-4.5-Air by Z AI | $0.20 / $1.10 | 81.5% | 73.3% | 80.7% | Jul 28, 2025 | |
| #95 Jamba 1.6 Mini by AI21 Labs | $0.20 / $0.40 | 36.7% | 30.0% | - | Mar 6, 2025 | |
| #96 Jamba 1.5 Mini by AI21 Labs | $0.20 / $0.40 | 37.1% | 30.2% | - | Aug 22, 2024 | |
| #97 Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.20 / $2.40 | 80.5% | 70.7% | 56.3% | Jul 30, 2025 | |
| #98 Qwen3 VL 30B A3B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.20 / $2.40 | 80.7% | 72.0% | 82.3% | Oct 3, 2025 | |
| #99 Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct by Alibaba | $0.20 / $0.80 | 76.4% | 69.5% | 72.3% | Oct 3, 2025 | |
| #100 Qwen3 30B A3B (Reasoning) by Alibaba | $0.20 / $2.40 | 77.7% | 61.6% | 72.3% | Apr 28, 2025 |
Showing 100 of 309 models
Chat with 100+ AI Models in one App.
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, GLM-5, Kimi K2.5 and many more.
Understanding the AI Model Leaderboard
This comprehensive AI model leaderboard helps you compare and choose the best large language models (LLMs) for your needs. We track standardized AI benchmarks, token pricing, inference speed, and model capabilities across all major AI providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, and DeepSeek.
Core AI Benchmarks Explained
Key Metrics to Consider
How to Choose the Right AI Model for Your Use Case
For Research & Analysis
Prioritize models with high MMLU-Pro (70%+) and GPQA (60%+) scores for complex reasoning tasks, academic research, and technical documentation
For Cost Optimization
Sort by input/output pricing - smaller models often deliver 80% of flagship performance at 10% of the cost for simple tasks
For Math & STEM
Filter by Math Index or AIME 2025 scores (50%+) for quantitative analysis, engineering calculations, and scientific applications
All benchmark scores and pricing data are updated daily from Artificial Analysis to reflect the latest model versions and capabilities. Use the sort filters above to find AI models by intelligence, cost, coding ability, math performance, speed, or release date.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is MMLU-Pro and why is it the standard AI intelligence benchmark?
MMLU-Pro (Massive Multitask Language Understanding - Professional) is the most comprehensive AI benchmark, testing models across 14 academic subjects including mathematics, science, history, law, and ethics. Scores range from 46% (basic competency) to 87% (near-expert level). Models scoring above 75% demonstrate strong general intelligence suitable for professional applications, while scores below 60% indicate limitations in complex reasoning tasks.
What does GPQA measure and which models score highest?
GPQA (Graduate-level Google-Proof Q&A) tests PhD-level reasoning with questions designed to be "Google-proof" - requiring deep understanding rather than simple fact retrieval. Top models like GPT-5.1 (87.3%), GPT-5 mini (82.8%), and o3 (82.7%) excel at GPQA, making them ideal for research, technical analysis, and complex problem-solving. Models below 50% GPQA struggle with advanced reasoning and may provide superficial answers to complex questions.
What is AIME 2025 and how does it evaluate AI mathematical ability?
AIME 2025 (American Invitational Mathematics Examination) is an elite math competition benchmark that tests advanced problem-solving, algebra, geometry, and number theory. Scores above 80% (like GPT-5 Codex at 98.7% or GPT-5.1 at 94%) indicate exceptional mathematical reasoning suitable for engineering, scientific computing, and quantitative analysis. Models scoring below 50% may struggle with multi-step mathematical problems or require explicit problem breakdown.
How is AI model pricing calculated and what's considered cost-effective?
AI model pricing is measured per 1 million tokens (approximately 750,000 words). Input pricing covers text you send, while output pricing covers generated responses. Budget models like Llama 3.3 70B cost $0.54/$0.71 per million tokens, mid-tier models like GPT-5 nano cost $0.05/$0.40, while premium models like GPT-5 cost $1.25/$10. For typical applications with 3:1 input-to-output ratio, budget models can be 10-20x cheaper than flagship models while maintaining 70-80% performance.
Which AI models are best for coding and programming tasks?
Sort by Coding Index to see top programming models. Our Coding Index combines LiveCodeBench, SciCode, and coding benchmarks. Top performers include GPT-5.1 (57.5 index), GPT-5 mini (51.4), and GPT-5 Codex (53.5). These models excel at code generation, debugging, refactoring, and explaining complex algorithms. For budget-conscious developers, models with 40+ coding index scores offer excellent value for routine programming tasks.
How often are AI model benchmarks and rankings updated?
Our leaderboard syncs daily with Artificial Analysis API to ensure benchmark scores (MMLU-Pro, GPQA, AIME 2025), pricing, and inference speed data reflect the latest model versions. New model releases appear immediately under the "Newest" sort option. Benchmark scores can change when providers release updated versions - for example, GPT-5.1 released in November 2025 achieved 69.7 intelligence compared to GPT-5's 68.5 from August 2025.
What inference speed (tokens/second) do I need for my application?
Inference speed determines how fast models generate responses. For real-time chatbots and interactive applications, target 100+ tokens/second (models like gpt-oss-120B at 340 tok/s). For background processing and batch jobs, 50-100 tok/s is sufficient. Premium reasoning models like GPT-5 (103 tok/s) balance speed and capability. Note that higher inference speed doesn't always mean better quality - slower models often deliver more thoughtful, detailed responses.
Can I test these AI models for free before committing?
Yes! Try our free AI chat interface to test different models instantly without creating an account. Many providers also offer free tiers: OpenAI (ChatGPT with daily limits), Anthropic (Claude with usage caps), Google (Gemini free tier), and open-source models like Llama 3.3. Compare performance on your specific use case before upgrading to paid plans.