AI Model Ranking (LLM Leaderboard)
Best AI Math Models
Language models ranked by Artificial Analysis Index
Best Picks
Start with these models
Quick recommendations from the current benchmark, speed, and pricing data.
Model AI model name and provider organization | Intelligence Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index - composite reasoning and capability score across the benchmark suite | Value Score Quality, speed, and blended token price combined into a relative value score | Speed Inference throughput in tokens per second - how fast the model generates responses | Context Maximum context window size - how much text, code, or conversation the model can process at once | Price Cost per 1 million tokens — input (text you send) / output (text the model generates) | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
#1 GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) by Z AI · Aug 11, 2025 | — | N/A | 48 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.60/$1.80 | |
#2 Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google · May 19, 2026 | — | N/A | 196 tok/s | 131K | $1.50/$9.00 | |
#3 MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi · Apr 22, 2026 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | $0.35/$0.70 | |
#4 JT-35B-Flash by China Mobile · May 14, 2026 | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#5 GPT-6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI · Sep 22, 2026 | — | N/A | 126 tok/s | 1.1M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
EU-hosted open models, one APIServers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres. Secure AI Chat made in EuropeChat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in. | ||||||
#6 Qwen3.5 Omni Plus by Alibaba · Mar 30, 2026 | — | N/A | 93 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.40/$4.80 | |
#7 Nova 2.0 Omni (Medium) by Amazon · Nov 26, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#8 GPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh) by OpenAI · Dec 11, 2025 | — | N/A | 116 tok/s | 1.1M | $1.75/$14.00 | |
#9 Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba · Feb 24, 2026 | — | N/A | 141 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.40/$3.20 | |
#10 Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning) by Google · Jun 3, 2026 | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#11 Gemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal) by Google · May 19, 2026 | — | N/A | 178 tok/s | 131K | $1.50/$9.00 | |
#12 Claude 3.5 Haiku by Anthropic · Oct 22, 2024 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#13 GPT-3.5 Turbo by OpenAI · Nov 30, 2022 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.1M | N/A/N/A | |
#14 Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Jan '25) by Google · Jan 21, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#15 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic · Sep 28, 2026 | 30.8 | 16 | 106 tok/s | 1.0M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#16 Qwen2.5 Coder Instruct 32B by Alibaba · Nov 11, 2024 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#17 Sonar Reasoning by Perplexity · Jan 28, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#18 Gemma 3 270M by Google · Aug 14, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#19 Grok 4.20 0309 (Reasoning) by SpaceXAI · Mar 10, 2026 | — | N/A | N/A | 500K | $2.00/$6.00 | |
#20 GPT-5.1 Codex (High) by OpenAI · Nov 13, 2025 | — | N/A | 127 tok/s | 1.1M | $1.25/$10.00 | |
#21 Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta · Aug 5, 2026 | — | N/A | 315 tok/s | 1.0M | $1.25/$4.25 | |
#22 GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI · Jul 9, 2026 | — | N/A | 123 tok/s | 1.1M | $0.20/$1.20 | |
#23 Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) by Anthropic · Sep 1, 2026 | 38.7 | 6 | 56 tok/s | 1.0M | $10.00/$50.00 | |
#24 Medium 3.1 by Mistral · Aug 12, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#25 GPT-5 nano (Minimal) by OpenAI · Aug 7, 2025 | — | N/A | 156 tok/s | 1.1M | $0.05/$0.40 | |
#26 Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview (May' 25) by Google · May 6, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | $1.25/$10.00 | |
#27 o3-mini (High) by OpenAI · Jan 31, 2025 | — | N/A | 263 tok/s | N/A | $1.10/$4.40 | |
#28 o1-preview by OpenAI · Sep 12, 2024 | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | $16.50/$66.00 | |
#29 V3.2 Exp (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek · Sep 29, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | $0.28/$0.42 | |
#30 1.1 by Apodex · Aug 30, 2026 | 13.7 | 17 | 178 tok/s | N/A | $0.30/$3.00 | |
#31 GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI · Jul 9, 2026 | — | N/A | 103 tok/s | 1.1M | $4.00/$20.00 | |
#32 GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI · Sep 29, 2026 | 52.5 | 19 | 62 tok/s | 1.1M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#33 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B Instruct by Alibaba · Jul 22, 2025 | — | N/A | 107 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.38/$1.40 | |
#34 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google · Jul 21, 2026 | 11.7 | 16 | 401 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.30/$2.50 | |
#35 Step 5 Preview by StepFun · Sep 18, 2026 | 28.5 | 28 | 122 tok/s | 1.0M | $1.00/$2.70 | |
#36 Qwen3.5 2B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba · Mar 2, 2026 | — | N/A | N/A | 262K | N/A/N/A | |
#37 Devstral 2 by Mistral · Dec 9, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#38 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct '24) by Anthropic · Oct 22, 2024 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | $3.00/$15.00 | |
#39 V3.1 Terminus (Reasoning) by DeepSeek · Sep 22, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | $1.64/$2.75 | |
#40 Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Instruct by Alibaba · Sep 22, 2025 | — | N/A | 94 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.25/$0.97 | |
#41 Grok Build 0.1 0616 by SpaceXAI · Jun 16, 2026 | — | N/A | 97 tok/s | 256K | $1.00/$2.00 | |
#42 Granite 4.2 3B by IBM · Aug 25, 2026 | 4.7 | N/A | N/A | 131K | N/A/N/A | |
#43 Claude Fable 5.2 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic · Nov 9, 2026 | 56.4 | 11 | 81 tok/s | 1.0M | $8.00/$40.00 | |
#44 GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI · Oct 26, 2026 | 30.5 | 16 | 72 tok/s | 1.1M | $1.00/$5.00 | |
#45 Gemini 4 Carbon (Medium) by Google · Oct 28, 2026 | 58.3 | 26 | 91 tok/s | 1.0M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#46 Nova 2.0 Pro Preview (Medium) by Amazon · Nov 27, 2025 | — | N/A | 116 tok/s | N/A | $1.25/$10.00 | |
#47 Inkling (Xhigh) by Thinking Machines · Jul 15, 2026 | 12.5 | 12 | 160 tok/s | 524K | $1.00/$4.05 | |
#48 K2.6 (Reasoning) by Kimi · Apr 20, 2026 | — | N/A | 43 tok/s | 262K | $0.95/$4.00 | |
#49 R1 (Jan '25) by DeepSeek · Jan 20, 2025 | — | N/A | 160 tok/s | 1.0M | $2.00/$4.00 | |
#50 R1 Distill Llama 8B by DeepSeek · Jan 20, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#51 Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba · Apr 28, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#52 Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) by Alibaba · Feb 16, 2026 | — | N/A | 58 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.60/$3.60 | |
#53 LFM2 1.2B by Liquid AI · Jul 10, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | 128K | N/A/N/A | |
#54 K2.6 (Non-reasoning) by Kimi · Apr 20, 2026 | — | N/A | 40 tok/s | 262K | $0.95/$4.00 | |
#55 Magistral Small 1 by Mistral · Jun 10, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#56 Granite 4.2 30B by IBM · Aug 25, 2026 | — | N/A | N/A | 131K | N/A/N/A | |
#57 K2 Horizon 7B by Institute of Foundation Models · Sep 3, 2026 | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#58 MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi · Sep 21, 2026 | 26.7 | 47 | 34 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.14/$0.28 | |
#59 LFM 40B by Liquid AI · Sep 30, 2024 | — | N/A | N/A | 128K | N/A/N/A | |
#60 M2.5 by MiniMax · Feb 12, 2026 | — | N/A | 52 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.30/$1.20 | |
#61 Small 4 (Non-reasoning) by Mistral · Mar 16, 2026 | — | N/A | 146 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.15/$0.60 | |
#62 Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic · Jul 24, 2026 | — | N/A | 53 tok/s | 1.0M | $5.00/$25.00 | |
#63 Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Reasoning) by Anthropic · Feb 24, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#64 Claude Sonnet 5 (Low) by Anthropic · Jun 30, 2026 | — | N/A | 68 tok/s | 1.0M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#65 MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) by Xiaomi · Dec 16, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#66 GLM-5-Turbo by Z AI · Mar 15, 2026 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#67 Ling-1T by InclusionAI · Oct 8, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#68 Solar Pro 4 by Upstage · Aug 6, 2026 | 14.2 | 18 | 94 tok/s | 524K | $0.30/$1.20 | |
#69 gpt-oss-20b (Low) by OpenAI · Aug 5, 2025 | — | N/A | 214 tok/s | 1.1M | $0.07/$0.30 | |
#70 Qwen3.5 27B (Reasoning) by Alibaba · Feb 24, 2026 | — | N/A | 76 tok/s | 262K | $0.30/$2.40 | |
#71 o3 by OpenAI · Apr 16, 2025 | — | N/A | 145 tok/s | N/A | $2.00/$8.00 | |
#72 Gemini 1.5 Pro (May '24) by Google · May 15, 2024 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#73 K-EXAONE 2.0 by LG AI Research · Aug 12, 2026 | 7.6 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#74 Qwen3 4B (Reasoning) by Alibaba · Apr 28, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#75 GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI · Aug 26, 2026 | 27.8 | 42 | 50 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.15/$0.50 | |
#76 GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI · Sep 22, 2026 | 23.5 | 56 | 109 tok/s | 1.1M | $0.10/$0.50 | |
#77 V3.1 (Reasoning) by DeepSeek · Aug 21, 2025 | — | N/A | 74 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.42/$1.34 | |
#78 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 (Reasoning) by NVIDIA · Mar 18, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#79 Step 3.5 Flash 2603 by StepFun · Apr 2, 2026 | — | N/A | 154 tok/s | 256K | $0.10/$0.30 | |
#80 Large 2 (Jul '24) by Mistral · Jul 24, 2024 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | $2.00/$6.00 | |
#81 DBRX Instruct by Databricks · Mar 27, 2024 | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#82 GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) by Z AI · Jul 28, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#83 Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B by Alibaba · Sep 19, 2024 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#84 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning) by Google · Jun 17, 2025 | — | N/A | 293 tok/s | 131K | $0.10/$0.40 | |
#85 Hermes 3 - Llama-3.1 70B by Nous Research · Aug 15, 2024 | — | N/A | 118 tok/s | N/A | $0.70/$0.70 | |
#86 North Mini Code by Cohere · Jun 9, 2026 | 3.4 | N/A | 155 tok/s | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#87 Sonar Reasoning Pro by Perplexity · Jan 28, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#88 GPT-5.5 (Xhigh) by OpenAI · Apr 23, 2026 | — | N/A | 70 tok/s | 1.1M | $5.00/$30.00 | |
#89 Medium by Mistral · Dec 11, 2023 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#90 GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) by OpenAI · Sep 3, 2026 | 55.3 | 9 | 46 tok/s | 1.1M | $10.00/$50.00 | |
#91 Nova 2.0 Omni (Non-reasoning) by Amazon · Nov 26, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#92 Granite 4.0 Micro by IBM · Sep 22, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | 131K | N/A/N/A | |
#93 Claude 3 Haiku by Anthropic · Mar 4, 2024 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | $0.25/$1.25 | |
#94 Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic · Oct 7, 2026 | 29.9 | 82 | 187 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.10/$0.50 | |
#95 Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI · Sep 21, 2026 | 31.1 | 13 | 66 tok/s | 500K | $2.00/$6.00 | |
#96 Claude Opus 5 (Low) by Anthropic · Jul 24, 2026 | — | N/A | 53 tok/s | 1.0M | $5.00/$25.00 | |
#97 Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba · Mar 2, 2026 | — | N/A | 145 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.17/$0.25 | |
#98 7B Instruct by Mistral · Sep 27, 2023 | — | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | $0.15/$0.20 | |
#99 Gemini 2.5 Flash (Reasoning) by Google · May 20, 2025 | — | N/A | 211 tok/s | 131K | $0.30/$2.50 | |
#100 Gemma 3 4B Instruct by Google · Mar 12, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
Showing 100 of 738 models
Understanding the AI Model Leaderboard
This comprehensive AI model leaderboard helps you compare and choose the best large language models (LLMs) for your needs. We track standardized AI benchmarks, token pricing, inference speed, and model capabilities across all major AI providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, and DeepSeek.
Core AI Benchmarks Explained
Key Metrics to Consider
How to Choose the Right AI Model for Your Use Case
For Research & Analysis
Prioritize models with high MMLU-Pro (70%+) and GPQA (60%+) scores for complex reasoning tasks, academic research, and technical documentation
For Cost Optimization
Sort by input/output pricing - smaller models often deliver 80% of flagship performance at 10% of the cost for simple tasks
For Math & STEM
Filter by Math Index or AIME 2025 scores (50%+) for quantitative analysis, engineering calculations, and scientific applications
All benchmark scores and pricing data are updated daily from Artificial Analysis to reflect the latest model versions and capabilities. Use the sort filters above to find AI models by intelligence, cost, coding ability, math performance, speed, or release date.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is MMLU-Pro and why is it the standard AI intelligence benchmark?
MMLU-Pro (Massive Multitask Language Understanding - Professional) is the most comprehensive AI benchmark, testing models across 14 academic subjects including mathematics, science, history, law, and ethics. Scores range from 46% (basic competency) to 87% (near-expert level). Models scoring above 75% demonstrate strong general intelligence suitable for professional applications, while scores below 60% indicate limitations in complex reasoning tasks.
What does GPQA measure and which models score highest?
GPQA (Graduate-level Google-Proof Q&A) tests PhD-level reasoning with questions designed to be "Google-proof" - requiring deep understanding rather than simple fact retrieval. Top models like GPT-5.1 (87.3%), GPT-5 mini (82.8%), and o3 (82.7%) excel at GPQA, making them ideal for research, technical analysis, and complex problem-solving. Models below 50% GPQA struggle with advanced reasoning and may provide superficial answers to complex questions.
What is AIME 2025 and how does it evaluate AI mathematical ability?
AIME 2025 (American Invitational Mathematics Examination) is an elite math competition benchmark that tests advanced problem-solving, algebra, geometry, and number theory. Scores above 80% (like GPT-5 Codex at 98.7% or GPT-5.1 at 94%) indicate exceptional mathematical reasoning suitable for engineering, scientific computing, and quantitative analysis. Models scoring below 50% may struggle with multi-step mathematical problems or require explicit problem breakdown.
How is AI model pricing calculated and what's considered cost-effective?
AI model pricing is measured per 1 million tokens (approximately 750,000 words). Input pricing covers text you send, while output pricing covers generated responses. Budget models like Llama 3.3 70B cost $0.54/$0.71 per million tokens, mid-tier models like GPT-5 nano cost $0.05/$0.40, while premium models like GPT-5 cost $1.25/$10. For typical applications with 3:1 input-to-output ratio, budget models can be 10-20x cheaper than flagship models while maintaining 70-80% performance.
Which AI models are best for coding and programming tasks?
Sort by Coding Index to see top programming models. Our Coding Index combines LiveCodeBench, SciCode, and coding benchmarks. Top performers include GPT-5.1 (57.5 index), GPT-5 mini (51.4), and GPT-5 Codex (53.5). These models excel at code generation, debugging, refactoring, and explaining complex algorithms. For budget-conscious developers, models with 40+ coding index scores offer excellent value for routine programming tasks.
How often are AI model benchmarks and rankings updated?
Our leaderboard syncs daily with Artificial Analysis API to ensure benchmark scores (MMLU-Pro, GPQA, AIME 2025), pricing, and inference speed data reflect the latest model versions. New model releases appear immediately under the "Newest" sort option. Benchmark scores can change when providers release updated versions - for example, GPT-5.1 released in November 2025 achieved 69.7 intelligence compared to GPT-5's 68.5 from August 2025.
What inference speed (tokens/second) do I need for my application?
Inference speed determines how fast models generate responses. For real-time chatbots and interactive applications, target 100+ tokens/second (models like gpt-oss-120B at 340 tok/s). For background processing and batch jobs, 50-100 tok/s is sufficient. Premium reasoning models like GPT-5 (103 tok/s) balance speed and capability. Note that higher inference speed doesn't always mean better quality - slower models often deliver more thoughtful, detailed responses.
Can I test these AI models for free before committing?
Use our AI chat with open-weight models like DeepSeek, Qwen and Kimi. Many providers also offer free tiers: OpenAI (ChatGPT with daily limits), Anthropic (Claude with usage caps), Google (Gemini free tier), and open-source models like Llama 3.3. Compare performance on your specific use case before upgrading to paid plans.