Model Comparison
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
vs. Grok 4.6 (high)
Comparing 2 AI models · 7 benchmarks · Anthropic, SpaceXAI
Recommended Pick
SpGrok 4.6 (high)10 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
Grok 4.6 (high)
100.0 value score
66.2 reasoning / $3.00/1M
Lowest Price
Grok 4.6 (high)
$2.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Grok 4.6 (high)
66.2 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Grok 4.6 (high)
76.8 coding index
Composite Indices
Higher is better; speed and price are normalized
Standard Benchmarks
Only benchmarks with data are shown
Differences That Matter
Best value
Grok 4.6 (high) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
Grok 4.6 (high) is 2.5x cheaper on input tokens than Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort).
Reasoning gap
Grok 4.6 (high) leads Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) by 3.3 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Grok 4.6 (high) leads Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) by 3.2 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Grok 4.6 (high) wins 10 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
Anthropic
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Grok 4.6 (high)
SpaceXAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Chat with leading AI models
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | An Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) | Top Pick Sp Grok 4.6 (high) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $5.00/1M | $2.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $25.00/1M | $6.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $10.00/1M | $3.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Anthropic | SpaceXAI |
| Release Date | Apr 16, 2026 | Aug 12, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | — | 62.9 tok/s |
| TTFT | — | 39172ms |
| Latency | — | 39172ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 28.5 | 100.0 |
| Reasoning Score | 62.9 | 66.2 |
| Intelligence | 55.0 | 60.9 |
| Coding | 73.6 | 76.8 |
| Standard Benchmarks | ||
| GPQA | 91.4% | 94.9% |
| HLE | 42.3% | 42.9% |
| SciCode | 54.5% | 53.6% |
| LCR | 75.3% | 75.0% |
| IFBench | 58.6% | — |
| TAU-bench v2 | 88.6% | — |
| TerminalBench Hard | 51.5% | — |
Key Takeaways
Grok 4.6 (high) offers the best value at $2.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Grok 4.6 (high) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 66.2 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Grok 4.6 (high) reaches a 76.8 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
Grok 4.6 (high)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
