Model Comparison

V3 (Dec '24)
vs. Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)

Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · DeepSeek, Anthropic

Recommended Pick

DeepSeek logoV3 (Dec '24)6 metric wins

Strongest on: Value, Input price, Output price

Best Value

DeepSeek logo

V3 (Dec '24)

100.0 value score

8.5 reasoning / $0.46/1M

Lowest Price

DeepSeek logo

V3 (Dec '24)

$0.32/1M input price

Best Reasoning

Anthropic logo

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)

56.0 reasoning score

Blends available reasoning benchmarks

Best for Coding

DeepSeek logo

V3 (Dec '24)

23.0 coding index

Differences That Matter

Best value

V3 (Dec '24) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.

Price gap

V3 (Dec '24) is 6.3x cheaper on input tokens than Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback).

Speed gap

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) generates about 3.5x as many tokens per second as V3 (Dec '24).

Reasoning gap

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) leads V3 (Dec '24) by 47.5 points on reasoning.

Top-pick rationale

V3 (Dec '24) wins 6 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.

Live compare

Response Face-Off

Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.

10 comparisons left in 24h
DeepSeek logo

V3 (Dec '24)

DeepSeek

Waiting

TTFT

—

Time

—

tok/s

—

Tokens

—

Cost

—

Waiting
Anthropic logo

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)

Anthropic

Waiting

TTFT

—

Time

—

tok/s

—

Tokens

—

Cost

—

Waiting

Which answer was more useful?

Secure AI Chat made in Europe

Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.

EU-hosted open models, one API

Servers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres.

Full Comparison

Metric
Top Pick
DeepSeek logoV3 (Dec '24)
DeepSeek
Anthropic logoClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
Anthropic
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input Cost$0.32/1M$2.00/1M
Output Cost$0.89/1M$10.00/1M
Blended (3:1)$0.46/1M$4.00/1M
Specifications
OrganizationDeepSeekAnthropic
Release DateDec 26, 2024Sep 28, 2026
Performance & Speed
Throughput37.0 tok/s130.7 tok/s
TTFT1250ms385530ms
Latency1250ms385530ms
Composite Indices
Value Score100.076.2
Reasoning Score8.556.0
Intelligence8.556.0
Coding23.0—

Key Takeaways

V3 (Dec '24) offers the best value at $0.32/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 56.0 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.

V3 (Dec '24) reaches a 23.0 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.

All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.

When to Choose Each Model

DeepSeek logo

V3 (Dec '24)

  • Cost-sensitive applications
  • High-volume processing
  • Code generation
  • Software development
Anthropic logo

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)

  • Complex reasoning tasks
  • Research & analysis