Model Comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
vs. Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Xiaomi, Alibaba
Recommended Pick
XiMiMo-V2.6-Pro9 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
100.0 value score
46.3 reasoning / $0.54/1M
Lowest Price
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
$0.43/1M input price
Best Reasoning
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
46.3 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
76.2 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
MiMo-V2.6-Pro has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 4.7x cheaper on input tokens than Qwen3.8 Max (0902).
Speed gap
MiMo-V2.6-Pro generates about 3.3x as many tokens per second as Qwen3.8 Max (0902).
Reasoning gap
MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by 0.9 points on reasoning.
Top-pick rationale
MiMo-V2.6-Pro wins 9 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Xiaomi
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Alibaba
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Xi MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Al Qwen3.8 Max (0902) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.43/1M | $2.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $0.87/1M | $6.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.54/1M | $3.00/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | Xiaomi | Alibaba |
| Release Date | Sep 21, 2026 | Sep 2, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 129.8 tok/s | 39.2 tok/s |
| TTFT | 2170ms | 2940ms |
| Latency | 17580ms | 53900ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 17.7 |
| Reasoning Score | 46.3 | 45.4 |
| Intelligence | 46.3 | 45.4 |
| Coding | — | 76.2 |
Key Takeaways
MiMo-V2.6-Pro offers the best value at $0.43/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro has the strongest reasoning profile with a 46.3 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) reaches a 76.2 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
- Code generation
- Software development
