Model Comparison
V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort)
vs. o1
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · DeepSeek, OpenAI
Recommended Pick
DeV4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort)7 metric winsStrongest on: Value, Input price, Output price
Best Value
V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort)
100.0 value score
35.0 reasoning / $0.66/1M
Lowest Price
V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort)
$0.44/1M input price
Best Reasoning
V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort)
35.0 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort)
65.0 coding index
Differences That Matter
Best value
V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort) has the strongest quality-to-price mix at 100.0 out of 100 value points.
Price gap
V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort) is 34.1x cheaper on input tokens than o1.
Reasoning gap
V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort) leads o1 by 19.8 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort) leads o1 by 25.3 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort) wins 7 measurable categories, including Value, Input price, Output price, Blended price.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort)
DeepSeek
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
o1
OpenAI
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick De V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort) | Op o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.44/1M | $15.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $1.32/1M | $60.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.66/1M | $26.25/1M |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Release Date | Aug 21, 2026 | Dec 5, 2024 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 217.1 tok/s | — |
| TTFT | 1070ms | — |
| Latency | 10280ms | — |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | 1.1 |
| Reasoning Score | 35.0 | 15.2 |
| Intelligence | 35.0 | 15.2 |
| Coding | 65.0 | 39.7 |
Key Takeaways
V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort) offers the best value at $0.44/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort) has the strongest reasoning profile with a 35.0 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort) reaches a 65.0 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
o1
- General-purpose AI
- Versatile applications
