Model Comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
vs. Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
Comparing 2 AI models · 0 benchmarks · Google
Recommended Pick
GoGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite5 metric winsStrongest on: Throughput, Latency, Reasoning
Lowest Price
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
$0.00/1M input price
Best Reasoning
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
22.7 reasoning score
Blends available reasoning benchmarks
Best for Coding
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
49.3 coding index
Differences That Matter
Price gap
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) is ∞x cheaper on input tokens than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.
Speed gap
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite generates about 9.0x as many tokens per second as Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning).
Reasoning gap
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) by 7.3 points on reasoning.
Coding gap
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) by 5.9 points on coding.
Top-pick rationale
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite wins 5 measurable categories, including Throughput, Latency, Reasoning, Intelligence.
Response Face-Off
Run one prompt through the selected models and compare response quality with live speed and cost context.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
TTFT
—
Time
—
tok/s
—
Tokens
—
Cost
—
Which answer was more useful?
Secure AI Chat made in Europe
Use Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini alongside with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi.
EU-hosted inference
Servers in Germany & Finland. Designed to meet strict GDPR and ISO 27001 compliance requirements.
Full Comparison
| Metric | Top Pick Go Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Go Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input Cost | $0.30/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Output Cost | $2.50/1M | $0.00/1M |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.85/1M | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Organization | ||
| Release Date | Jul 21, 2026 | Apr 2, 2026 |
| Performance & Speed | ||
| Throughput | 320.2 tok/s | 35.5 tok/s |
| TTFT | 7090ms | 1110ms |
| Latency | 7090ms | 49990ms |
| Composite Indices | ||
| Value Score | 100.0 | — |
| Reasoning Score | 22.7 | 15.4 |
| Intelligence | 22.7 | 15.4 |
| Coding | 49.3 | 43.4 |
Key Takeaways
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning) offers the best value at $0.00/1M,making it ideal for high-volume applications and cost-conscious projects.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has the strongest reasoning profile with a 22.7 reasoning score,combining the available reasoning-heavy benchmarks.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite reaches a 49.3 coding index,making it the top choice for software development and code generation tasks.
All models support context windows of ∞+ tokens,suitable for processing lengthy documents and maintaining extended conversations.
When to Choose Each Model
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- Complex reasoning tasks
- Research & analysis
- Code generation
- Software development
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
- Cost-sensitive applications
- High-volume processing
