AI Model Ranking (LLM Leaderboard)

Most Intelligent AI Models

Language models ranked by Artificial Analysis Index

Model
AI model name and provider organization
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index - composite reasoning and capability score across the benchmark suite
Value Score
Quality, speed, and blended token price combined into a relative value score
Speed
Inference throughput in tokens per second - how fast the model generates responses
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
#1 Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
by Anthropic · Sep 1, 2026
56.8967 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-6 Astra (max)
#2 GPT-6 Astra (max)
by OpenAI · Sep 3, 2026
54.7962 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-6 Astra (xhigh)
#3 GPT-6 Astra (xhigh)
by OpenAI · Sep 3, 2026
54.3957 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#4 Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic · Jul 24, 2026
54.11258 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback)
#5 Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback)
by Anthropic · Sep 1, 2026
53.8969 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort)
#6 Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort)
by Anthropic · Jul 24, 2026
53.41256 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-6 Astra (high)
#7 GPT-6 Astra (high)
by OpenAI · Sep 3, 2026
53.4961 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)
#8 Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)
by Anthropic · Jun 9, 2026
53.2970 tok/s
Meta AI provider logo - Muse Spark 1.3 (max)
#9 Muse Spark 1.3 (max)
by Meta · Sep 2, 2026
53.045190 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-6 Astra (medium)
#10 GPT-6 Astra (medium)
by OpenAI · Sep 3, 2026
52.2858 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort)
#11 Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort)
by Anthropic · Jul 24, 2026
52.01255 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback)
#12 Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback)
by Anthropic · Sep 1, 2026
51.7856 tok/s
Meta AI provider logo - Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh)
#13 Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh)
by Meta · Sep 2, 2026
51.642120 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (max)
#14 GPT-5.6 Sol (max)
by OpenAI · Jul 9, 2026
51.31585 tok/s
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.6 (high)
#15 Grok 4.6 (high)
by SpaceXAI · Aug 12, 2026
50.62164 tok/s
Kimi AI provider logo - K3 (max)
#16 K3 (max)
by Kimi · Jul 16, 2026
50.21540 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback)
#17 Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback)
by Anthropic · Sep 1, 2026
49.9857 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh)
#18 GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh)
by OpenAI · Jul 9, 2026
49.81481 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort)
#19 Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort)
by Anthropic · Jul 24, 2026
49.51153 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-6 Astra (low)
#20 GPT-6 Astra (low)
by OpenAI · Sep 3, 2026
49.3859 tok/s
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.6 (xhigh)
#21 Grok 4.6 (xhigh)
by SpaceXAI · Aug 12, 2026
49.32064 tok/s
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-5.3 (max)
#22 GLM-5.3 (max)
by Z AI · Aug 18, 2026
48.62784 tok/s
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.6 (medium)
#23 Grok 4.6 (medium)
by SpaceXAI · Aug 12, 2026
48.42062 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (high)
#24 GPT-5.6 Sol (high)
by OpenAI · Jul 9, 2026
48.31273 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)
#25 Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)
by Anthropic · Sep 1, 2026
47.8856 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-6 Astra (Non-reasoning)
#26 GPT-6 Astra (Non-reasoning)
by OpenAI · Sep 3, 2026
47.810N/A
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)
#27 Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)
by Google · Sep 2, 2026
47.137N/A
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.8 Max
#28 Qwen3.8 Max
by Alibaba · Aug 3, 2026
46.91940 tok/s
Meta AI provider logo - Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh)
#29 Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh)
by Meta · Aug 5, 2026
46.840260 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium)
#30 Gemini 3.8 Flash (medium)
by Google · Sep 2, 2026
46.837N/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (max)
#31 GPT-5.6 Terra (max)
by OpenAI · Jul 9, 2026
46.823110 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
#32 Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
by Alibaba · Aug 12, 2026
46.71940 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.8 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#33 Claude Opus 4.8 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic · May 28, 2026
46.41162 tok/s
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-5.3-Flash
#34 GLM-5.3-Flash
by Z AI · Aug 26, 2026
46.26847 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (medium)
#35 GPT-5.6 Sol (medium)
by OpenAI · Jul 9, 2026
46.01272 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.5 (xhigh)
#36 GPT-5.5 (xhigh)
by OpenAI · Apr 23, 2026
45.61185 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
#37 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
by Alibaba · Aug 26, 2026
45.66866 tok/s
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.5 (high)
#38 Grok 4.5 (high)
by SpaceXAI · Jul 8, 2026
45.51958 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)
#39 Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)
by Google · Aug 13, 2026
45.244309 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#40 Claude Sonnet 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic · Jun 30, 2026
45.11675 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh)
#41 GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh)
by OpenAI · Jul 9, 2026
44.41786 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#42 Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic · Apr 16, 2026
44.31052 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.5 (high)
#43 GPT-5.5 (high)
by OpenAI · Apr 23, 2026
44.11078 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort)
#44 Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort)
by Anthropic · Jul 24, 2026
43.81054 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Luna (max)
#45 GPT-5.6 Luna (max)
by OpenAI · Jul 9, 2026
43.477133 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium)
#46 Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium)
by Google · Aug 13, 2026
43.442299 tok/s
Meta AI provider logo - Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
#47 Muse Spark 1.1 (xhigh)
by Meta · Jul 9, 2026
43.329N/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.4 (xhigh)
#48 GPT-5.4 (xhigh)
by OpenAI · Mar 5, 2026
42.822149 tok/s
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-5.2 (max)
#49 GLM-5.2 (max)
by Z AI · Jun 16, 2026
42.52171 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)
#50 Gemini 3.8 Flash (low)
by Google · Sep 2, 2026
42.433N/A
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort)
#51 V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort)
by DeepSeek · Aug 13, 2026
42.12166 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)
#52 Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)
by Google · May 19, 2026
41.927206 tok/s
SpaceXAI AI provider logo - Grok 4.6 (low)
#53 Grok 4.6 (low)
by SpaceXAI · Aug 12, 2026
41.81755 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.5 (medium)
#54 GPT-5.5 (medium)
by OpenAI · Apr 23, 2026
41.6971 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh)
#55 GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh)
by OpenAI · Jul 9, 2026
41.669117 tok/s
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort)
#56 V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort)
by DeepSeek · Aug 21, 2026
41.559120 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)
#57 Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)
by Alibaba · Aug 14, 2026
41.42844 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (high)
#58 GPT-5.6 Terra (high)
by OpenAI · Jul 9, 2026
41.31687 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.7 Flash (low)
#59 Gemini 3.7 Flash (low)
by Google · Aug 13, 2026
41.140286 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (low)
#60 GPT-5.6 Sol (low)
by OpenAI · Jul 9, 2026
40.81067 tok/s
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort)
#61 V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort)
by DeepSeek · Jul 31, 2026
40.860134 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)
#62 Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)
by Google · Jul 21, 2026
40.339215 tok/s
Sapiens AI AI provider logo - Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta
#63 Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta
by Sapiens AI · Aug 26, 2026
39.598N/A
Kimi AI provider logo - K3 (low)
#64 K3 (low)
by Kimi · Jul 16, 2026
38.81139 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#65 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic · Feb 17, 2026
38.51159 tok/s
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium)
#66 Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium)
by Google · May 19, 2026
38.025223 tok/s
Motif Technologies AI provider logo - Motif 3
#67 Motif 3
by Motif Technologies · Aug 12, 2026
38.0N/AN/A
MBZUAI Institute of Foundation Models AI provider logo - K2 Horizon 375B A23B
#68 K2 Horizon 375B A23B
by MBZUAI Institute of Foundation Models · Sep 3, 2026
37.8N/AN/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Luna (high)
#69 GPT-5.6 Luna (high)
by OpenAI · Jul 9, 2026
37.466123 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Terra (medium)
#70 GPT-5.6 Terra (medium)
by OpenAI · Jul 9, 2026
37.21483 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.7 Max
#71 Qwen3.7 Max
by Alibaba · May 19, 2026
37.023202 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh)
#72 GPT-5.3 Codex (xhigh)
by OpenAI · Feb 5, 2026
36.920134 tok/s
Motif Technologies AI provider logo - Motif 3 (Beta)
#73 Motif 3 (Beta)
by Motif Technologies · Jul 14, 2026
36.8N/AN/A
Google AI provider logo - Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
#74 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
by Google · Feb 19, 2026
36.719115 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
#75 Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
by Anthropic · Feb 5, 2026
36.4843 tok/s
Kimi AI provider logo - K2.6
#76 K2.6
by Kimi · Apr 20, 2026
35.82046 tok/s
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort)
#77 V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort)
by DeepSeek · Apr 24, 2026
35.83562 tok/s
Meta AI provider logo - Muse Spark
#78 Muse Spark
by Meta · Apr 8, 2026
35.8N/AN/A
MiniMax AI provider logo - M3
#79 M3
by MiniMax · Jun 1, 2026
35.74186 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
#80 Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
by Anthropic · Apr 16, 2026
35.4846 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.5 (low)
#81 GPT-5.5 (low)
by OpenAI · Apr 23, 2026
35.3875 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.8 27B (medium)
#82 Qwen3.8 27B (medium)
by Alibaba · Aug 14, 2026
35.22452 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.2 (xhigh)
#83 GPT-5.2 (xhigh)
by OpenAI · Dec 11, 2025
35.01175 tok/s
Apodex AI provider logo - 1.1
#84 1.1
by Apodex · Aug 30, 2026
34.934N/A
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort)
#85 V4 Pro (Reasoning, High Effort)
by DeepSeek · Apr 24, 2026
34.63464 tok/s
Kimi AI provider logo - K2.7 Code
#86 K2.7 Code
by Kimi · Jun 12, 2026
33.91945 tok/s
Multiverse Computing AI provider logo - Quasar 438B (max, based on GLM-5.2)
#87 Quasar 438B (max, based on GLM-5.2)
by Multiverse Computing · Aug 10, 2026
33.943182 tok/s
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.8 27B (low)
#88 Qwen3.8 27B (low)
by Alibaba · Aug 14, 2026
33.82352 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)
#89 Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)
by Anthropic · Nov 24, 2025
33.6853 tok/s
Anthropic AI provider logo - Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
#90 Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
by Anthropic · Jun 30, 2026
33.51263 tok/s
Tencent AI provider logo - Hy3
#91 Hy3
by Tencent · Jul 6, 2026
33.26295 tok/s
Xiaomi AI provider logo - MiMo-V2-Pro
#92 MiMo-V2-Pro
by Xiaomi · Mar 18, 2026
33.1N/AN/A
DeepSeek AI provider logo - V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)
#93 V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)
by DeepSeek · Apr 24, 2026
33.177N/A
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh)
#94 GPT-5.2 Codex (xhigh)
by OpenAI · Dec 11, 2025
33.014N/A
Alibaba AI provider logo - Qwen3.6 Max Preview
#95 Qwen3.6 Max Preview
by Alibaba · Apr 20, 2026
32.91454 tok/s
OpenAI AI provider logo - GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning)
#96 GPT-5.6 Sol (Non-reasoning)
by OpenAI · Jul 9, 2026
32.9867 tok/s
Upstage AI provider logo - Solar Pro 4
#97 Solar Pro 4
by Upstage · Aug 6, 2026
32.73270 tok/s
Nex AGI AI provider logo - Nex-N2-Pro
#98 Nex-N2-Pro
by Nex AGI · Jun 2, 2026
32.739129 tok/s
Xiaomi AI provider logo - MiMo-V2.5-Pro
#99 MiMo-V2.5-Pro
by Xiaomi · Apr 22, 2026
32.63235 tok/s
Z AI AI provider logo - GLM-5 (Reasoning)
#100 GLM-5 (Reasoning)
by Z AI · Feb 11, 2026
32.41969 tok/s

Showing 100 of 642 models

Understanding the AI Model Leaderboard

This comprehensive AI model leaderboard helps you compare and choose the best large language models (LLMs) for your needs. We track standardized AI benchmarks, token pricing, inference speed, and model capabilities across all major AI providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, and DeepSeek.

Core AI Benchmarks Explained

MMLU-ProTests broad knowledge across 14 academic subjects
GPQAPhD-level reasoning & problem-solving
AIME 2025Elite mathematical reasoning
Coding IndexLiveCodeBench + SciCode composite
Math IndexAIME + MATH-500 composite

Key Metrics to Consider

Token PricingInput vs output cost per 1M tokens
Inference SpeedTokens/sec for response time
Release DateLatest techniques & knowledge
Benchmark Scores0-100% capability comparison

How to Choose the Right AI Model for Your Use Case

For Research & Analysis

Prioritize models with high MMLU-Pro (70%+) and GPQA (60%+) scores for complex reasoning tasks, academic research, and technical documentation

For Cost Optimization

Sort by input/output pricing - smaller models often deliver 80% of flagship performance at 10% of the cost for simple tasks

For Math & STEM

Filter by Math Index or AIME 2025 scores (50%+) for quantitative analysis, engineering calculations, and scientific applications

All benchmark scores and pricing data are updated daily from Artificial Analysis to reflect the latest model versions and capabilities. Use the sort filters above to find AI models by intelligence, cost, coding ability, math performance, speed, or release date.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is MMLU-Pro and why is it the standard AI intelligence benchmark?

MMLU-Pro (Massive Multitask Language Understanding - Professional) is the most comprehensive AI benchmark, testing models across 14 academic subjects including mathematics, science, history, law, and ethics. Scores range from 46% (basic competency) to 87% (near-expert level). Models scoring above 75% demonstrate strong general intelligence suitable for professional applications, while scores below 60% indicate limitations in complex reasoning tasks.

What does GPQA measure and which models score highest?

GPQA (Graduate-level Google-Proof Q&A) tests PhD-level reasoning with questions designed to be "Google-proof" - requiring deep understanding rather than simple fact retrieval. Top models like GPT-5.1 (87.3%), GPT-5 mini (82.8%), and o3 (82.7%) excel at GPQA, making them ideal for research, technical analysis, and complex problem-solving. Models below 50% GPQA struggle with advanced reasoning and may provide superficial answers to complex questions.

What is AIME 2025 and how does it evaluate AI mathematical ability?

AIME 2025 (American Invitational Mathematics Examination) is an elite math competition benchmark that tests advanced problem-solving, algebra, geometry, and number theory. Scores above 80% (like GPT-5 Codex at 98.7% or GPT-5.1 at 94%) indicate exceptional mathematical reasoning suitable for engineering, scientific computing, and quantitative analysis. Models scoring below 50% may struggle with multi-step mathematical problems or require explicit problem breakdown.

How is AI model pricing calculated and what's considered cost-effective?

AI model pricing is measured per 1 million tokens (approximately 750,000 words). Input pricing covers text you send, while output pricing covers generated responses. Budget models like Llama 3.3 70B cost $0.54/$0.71 per million tokens, mid-tier models like GPT-5 nano cost $0.05/$0.40, while premium models like GPT-5 cost $1.25/$10. For typical applications with 3:1 input-to-output ratio, budget models can be 10-20x cheaper than flagship models while maintaining 70-80% performance.

Which AI models are best for coding and programming tasks?

Sort by Coding Index to see top programming models. Our Coding Index combines LiveCodeBench, SciCode, and coding benchmarks. Top performers include GPT-5.1 (57.5 index), GPT-5 mini (51.4), and GPT-5 Codex (53.5). These models excel at code generation, debugging, refactoring, and explaining complex algorithms. For budget-conscious developers, models with 40+ coding index scores offer excellent value for routine programming tasks.

How often are AI model benchmarks and rankings updated?

Our leaderboard syncs daily with Artificial Analysis API to ensure benchmark scores (MMLU-Pro, GPQA, AIME 2025), pricing, and inference speed data reflect the latest model versions. New model releases appear immediately under the "Newest" sort option. Benchmark scores can change when providers release updated versions - for example, GPT-5.1 released in November 2025 achieved 69.7 intelligence compared to GPT-5's 68.5 from August 2025.

What inference speed (tokens/second) do I need for my application?

Inference speed determines how fast models generate responses. For real-time chatbots and interactive applications, target 100+ tokens/second (models like gpt-oss-120B at 340 tok/s). For background processing and batch jobs, 50-100 tok/s is sufficient. Premium reasoning models like GPT-5 (103 tok/s) balance speed and capability. Note that higher inference speed doesn't always mean better quality - slower models often deliver more thoughtful, detailed responses.

Can I test these AI models for free before committing?

Yes! Try our free AI chat interface to test different models instantly without creating an account. Many providers also offer free tiers: OpenAI (ChatGPT with daily limits), Anthropic (Claude with usage caps), Google (Gemini free tier), and open-source models like Llama 3.3. Compare performance on your specific use case before upgrading to paid plans.