AI Model Ranking (LLM Leaderboard)
Most Intelligent AI Models
Language models ranked by Artificial Analysis Index
Best Picks
Start with these models
Quick recommendations from the current benchmark, speed, and pricing data.
Model AI model name and provider organization | Intelligence Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index - composite reasoning and capability score across the benchmark suite | Value Score Quality, speed, and blended token price combined into a relative value score | Speed Inference throughput in tokens per second - how fast the model generates responses | Context Maximum context window size - how much text, code, or conversation the model can process at once | Price Cost per 1 million tokens — input (text you send) / output (text the model generates) | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
#1 Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google · Oct 28, 2026 | 59.4 | 18 | 85 tok/s | 1.0M | $4.00/$20.00 | |
#2 Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) by Anthropic · Sep 22, 2026 | 58.4 | 20 | 97 tok/s | 1.0M | $4.00/$20.00 | |
#3 Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic · Sep 22, 2026 | 57.0 | 17 | 83 tok/s | 1.0M | $4.00/$20.00 | |
#4 GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI · Sep 3, 2026 | 56.9 | 9 | 73 tok/s | 1.1M | $10.00/$50.00 | |
#5 GPT-6 Astra (Xhigh) by OpenAI · Sep 3, 2026 | 55.3 | 9 | 64 tok/s | 1.1M | $10.00/$50.00 | |
EU-hosted open models, one APIServers in Germany & Finland. Operated by a German company under the GDPR, DPA available, ISO 27001-certified data centres. Secure AI Chat made in EuropeChat with EU-Hosted Models like Deepseek, Qwen & Kimi: open-weight, transparent, no lock-in. | ||||||
#6 GPT-6 Astra (High) by OpenAI · Sep 3, 2026 | 54.8 | 9 | 62 tok/s | 1.1M | $10.00/$50.00 | |
#7 GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) by OpenAI · Sep 29, 2026 | 54.5 | 20 | 71 tok/s | 1.1M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#8 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) by Anthropic · Sep 28, 2026 | 54.2 | 33 | 139 tok/s | 1.0M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#9 GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI · Sep 29, 2026 | 52.3 | 19 | 69 tok/s | 1.1M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#10 Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic · Sep 22, 2026 | 51.7 | 14 | 78 tok/s | 1.0M | $4.00/$20.00 | |
#11 GPT-6 Astra (Medium) by OpenAI · Sep 3, 2026 | 51.5 | 9 | 57 tok/s | 1.1M | $10.00/$50.00 | |
#12 GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) by OpenAI · Oct 26, 2026 | 51.0 | 35 | 97 tok/s | 1.1M | $1.00/$5.00 | |
#13 Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google · Sep 30, 2026 | 50.4 | 15 | 83 tok/s | 1.0M | $4.00/$20.00 | |
#14 GPT-6.1 Sol (High) by OpenAI · Sep 29, 2026 | 50.2 | 19 | 53 tok/s | 1.1M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#15 Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic · Sep 1, 2026 | 49.7 | 8 | 62 tok/s | 1.0M | $10.00/$50.00 | |
#16 Muse Wonder Full (Max) by Meta · Oct 12, 2026 | 49.7 | N/A | N/A | 1.0M | N/A/N/A | |
#17 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) by Anthropic · Sep 28, 2026 | 49.6 | 26 | 105 tok/s | 1.0M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#18 Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) by Anthropic · Sep 1, 2026 | 49.0 | 8 | 69 tok/s | 1.0M | $10.00/$50.00 | |
#19 Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic · Sep 22, 2026 | 48.1 | 13 | 77 tok/s | 1.0M | $4.00/$20.00 | |
#20 Claude Fable 5.1 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic · Sep 1, 2026 | 47.0 | 8 | 55 tok/s | 1.0M | $10.00/$50.00 | |
#21 GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) by OpenAI · Sep 29, 2026 | 46.1 | 17 | 51 tok/s | 1.1M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#22 K3.1 Pro by Kimi · Oct 23, 2026 | 46.0 | 17 | 31 tok/s | 1.0M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#23 GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI · Oct 26, 2026 | 45.0 | 29 | 93 tok/s | 1.1M | $1.00/$5.00 | |
#24 Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta · Oct 12, 2026 | 43.3 | 19 | 143 tok/s | 1.0M | $4.00/$20.00 | |
#25 Claude Fable 5.1 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic · Sep 1, 2026 | 43.0 | 7 | 54 tok/s | 1.0M | $10.00/$50.00 | |
#26 GPT-6 Astra (Low) by OpenAI · Sep 3, 2026 | 43.0 | 7 | 57 tok/s | 1.1M | $10.00/$50.00 | |
#27 GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI · Oct 26, 2026 | 42.3 | 27 | 92 tok/s | 1.1M | $1.00/$5.00 | |
#28 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) by Anthropic · Sep 28, 2026 | 41.1 | 20 | 100 tok/s | 1.0M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#29 Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) by Anthropic · Sep 1, 2026 | 38.5 | 6 | 53 tok/s | 1.0M | $10.00/$50.00 | |
#30 GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) by OpenAI · Oct 26, 2026 | 38.1 | 24 | 91 tok/s | 1.1M | $1.00/$5.00 | |
#31 Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta · Sep 2, 2026 | 36.4 | 32 | 167 tok/s | 1.0M | $1.25/$4.25 | |
#32 Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic · Oct 7, 2026 | 36.2 | 100 | 234 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.10/$0.50 | |
#33 Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI · Sep 21, 2026 | 35.0 | 16 | 78 tok/s | 500K | $2.00/$6.00 | |
#34 Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) by Anthropic · Sep 22, 2026 | 34.5 | 9 | 75 tok/s | 1.0M | $4.00/$20.00 | |
#35 GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI · Sep 29, 2026 | 34.5 | 13 | 53 tok/s | 1.1M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#36 Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic · Oct 7, 2026 | 34.3 | 95 | 190 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.10/$0.50 | |
#37 Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI · Sep 21, 2026 | 34.3 | 16 | 84 tok/s | 500K | $2.00/$6.00 | |
#38 Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba · Sep 2, 2026 | 33.6 | 14 | 40 tok/s | 1.0M | $2.00/$6.00 | |
#39 V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek · Oct 17, 2026 | 32.5 | 55 | 171 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.30/$1.20 | |
#40 GLM-5.3 (Max) by Z AI · Aug 18, 2026 | 31.7 | 17 | 77 tok/s | 1.0M | $1.40/$4.40 | |
#41 Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI · Sep 21, 2026 | 30.9 | 13 | 71 tok/s | 500K | $2.00/$6.00 | |
#42 Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google · Sep 2, 2026 | 30.5 | 29 | 120 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.75/$3.75 | |
#43 GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI · Oct 26, 2026 | 30.4 | 19 | 90 tok/s | 1.1M | $1.00/$5.00 | |
#44 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) by Anthropic · Sep 28, 2026 | 30.3 | 15 | 99 tok/s | 1.0M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#45 Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google · Sep 2, 2026 | 30.0 | 24 | N/A | 1.0M | $0.75/$3.75 | |
#46 MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi · Sep 21, 2026 | 29.9 | 30 | 47 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.43/$0.87 | |
#47 Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic · Oct 7, 2026 | 29.6 | 82 | 169 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.10/$0.50 | |
#48 Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 by InclusionAI · Oct 22, 2026 | 29.5 | 43 | N/A | 1.0M | $0.30/$0.90 | |
#49 GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI · Oct 26, 2026 | 29.2 | 19 | 91 tok/s | 1.1M | $1.00/$5.00 | |
#50 M3.1-Flash by MiniMax · Oct 19, 2026 | 28.9 | 68 | 122 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.15/$0.60 | |
#51 Step 5 Preview by StepFun · Sep 18, 2026 | 28.5 | 29 | 154 tok/s | 1.0M | $1.00/$2.70 | |
#52 GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI · Aug 26, 2026 | 27.8 | 42 | 69 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.15/$0.50 | |
#53 GPT-6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI · Sep 22, 2026 | 27.8 | 73 | 118 tok/s | 1.1M | $0.10/$0.50 | |
#54 MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi · Sep 21, 2026 | 26.7 | 47 | 42 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.14/$0.28 | |
#55 Large 4 (High) by Mistral · Oct 29, 2026 | 26.0 | 31 | 161 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.70/$2.10 | |
#56 Large 4 Preview by Mistral · Oct 6, 2026 | 25.3 | 31 | 128 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.70/$2.10 | |
#57 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) by Anthropic · Sep 28, 2026 | 25.3 | 13 | 102 tok/s | 1.0M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#58 Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta · Oct 15, 2026 | 24.7 | 22 | 140 tok/s | 1.0M | $1.25/$4.25 | |
#59 Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) by Anthropic · Oct 7, 2026 | 24.6 | 68 | 165 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.10/$0.50 | |
#60 GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI · Sep 22, 2026 | 23.3 | 62 | 120 tok/s | 1.1M | $0.10/$0.50 | |
#61 Large 4 (Medium) by Mistral · Oct 29, 2026 | 23.1 | 22 | N/A | 1.0M | $0.70/$2.10 | |
#62 V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek · Aug 13, 2026 | 23.1 | 16 | 98 tok/s | 1.0M | $1.32/$3.96 | |
#63 GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI · Aug 18, 2026 | 23.1 | 12 | 72 tok/s | 1.0M | $1.40/$4.40 | |
#64 Gemini 3.8 Flash (Low) by Google · Sep 2, 2026 | 22.3 | 18 | N/A | 1.0M | $0.75/$3.75 | |
#65 GPT-6 Luna (High) by OpenAI · Sep 22, 2026 | 21.4 | 53 | 113 tok/s | 1.1M | $0.10/$0.50 | |
#66 Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba · Aug 14, 2026 | 20.1 | 14 | 39 tok/s | 262K | $0.50/$3.00 | |
#67 M3 by MiniMax · Jun 1, 2026 | 18.7 | 28 | 110 tok/s | 524K | $0.30/$1.20 | |
#68 Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) by Anthropic · Oct 7, 2026 | 18.6 | 51 | 151 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.10/$0.50 | |
#69 V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek · Oct 17, 2026 | 18.5 | 32 | 270 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.30/$1.20 | |
#70 GPT-6 Luna (Medium) by OpenAI · Sep 22, 2026 | 18.3 | 40 | N/A | 1.1M | $0.10/$0.50 | |
#71 K2 Horizon 375B A23B by Institute of Foundation Models · Sep 3, 2026 | 17.8 | N/A | 121 tok/s | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#72 Beam 1.0 by Reflection · Oct 16, 2026 | 17.7 | 28 | 318 tok/s | N/A | $0.40/$1.20 | |
#73 Qwen3.8 27B (Medium) by Alibaba · Aug 14, 2026 | 17.5 | 12 | 42 tok/s | 262K | $0.50/$3.00 | |
#74 K3 (Low) by Kimi · Jul 16, 2026 | 17.4 | 5 | 51 tok/s | 1.0M | $3.00/$15.00 | |
#75 Qwen3.8 27B (Low) by Alibaba · Aug 14, 2026 | 15.7 | 11 | 44 tok/s | 262K | $0.50/$3.00 | |
#76 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA · Oct 15, 2026 | 13.6 | 32 | 474 tok/s | 262K | $0.20/$0.50 | |
#77 Inkling Small by Thinking Machines · Jul 30, 2026 | 12.9 | 22 | 216 tok/s | 524K | $0.30/$1.20 | |
#78 Inkling (Xhigh) by Thinking Machines · Jul 15, 2026 | 12.5 | 12 | 191 tok/s | 524K | $1.00/$4.05 | |
#79 Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning) by NVIDIA · Jun 4, 2026 | 11.8 | 14 | 151 tok/s | 203K | $0.60/$2.70 | |
#80 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google · Jul 21, 2026 | 11.7 | 16 | 402 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.30/$2.50 | |
#81 Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba · Aug 14, 2026 | 10.0 | 7 | 42 tok/s | 262K | $0.50/$3.00 | |
#82 GPT-6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI · Sep 22, 2026 | 9.7 | 27 | 125 tok/s | 1.1M | $0.10/$0.50 | |
#83 GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI · Sep 22, 2026 | 9.4 | 23 | 111 tok/s | 1.1M | $0.10/$0.50 | |
#84 Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta · Aug 10, 2026 | 6.3 | 9 | 108 tok/s | 131K | $0.30/$1.20 | |
#85 Command A+ by Cohere · May 20, 2026 | 6.2 | N/A | 145 tok/s | 192K | N/A/N/A | |
#86 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning by NVIDIA · Aug 11, 2026 | 5.5 | 22 | 293 tok/s | 262K | $0.06/$0.20 | |
#87 Granite 4.2 3B by IBM · Aug 25, 2026 | 4.7 | N/A | N/A | 131K | N/A/N/A | |
#88 Small 4 (Reasoning) by Mistral · Mar 16, 2026 | 4.3 | 10 | 168 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.15/$0.60 | |
#89 Nemotron 3 Nano 4B by NVIDIA · Mar 16, 2026 | 1.8 | N/A | N/A | 203K | N/A/N/A | |
#90 GLM-4.5V (Non-reasoning) by Z AI · Aug 11, 2025 | — | N/A | 65 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.60/$1.80 | |
#91 Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google · May 19, 2026 | — | N/A | 194 tok/s | 1.0M | $1.50/$9.00 | |
#92 MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi · Apr 22, 2026 | — | N/A | 52 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.41/$1.02 | |
#93 JT-35B-Flash by China Mobile · May 14, 2026 | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#94 GPT-6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI · Sep 22, 2026 | — | N/A | 111 tok/s | 1.1M | $2.00/$10.00 | |
#95 Qwen3.5 Omni Plus by Alibaba · Mar 30, 2026 | — | N/A | 110 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.40/$4.80 | |
#96 Nova 2.0 Omni (Medium) by Amazon · Nov 26, 2025 | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A/N/A | |
#97 GPT-5.2 Codex (Xhigh) by OpenAI · Dec 11, 2025 | — | N/A | 88 tok/s | 1.1M | $1.75/$14.00 | |
#98 Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Non-reasoning) by Alibaba · Feb 24, 2026 | — | N/A | 142 tok/s | 1.0M | $0.40/$3.20 | |
#99 Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning) by Google · Jun 3, 2026 | — | N/A | 117 tok/s | N/A | $0.10/$0.30 | |
#100 Gemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal) by Google · May 19, 2026 | — | N/A | 170 tok/s | 131K | $1.50/$9.00 | |
Showing 100 of 716 models
Understanding the AI Model Leaderboard
This comprehensive AI model leaderboard helps you compare and choose the best large language models (LLMs) for your needs. We track standardized AI benchmarks, token pricing, inference speed, and model capabilities across all major AI providers like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, and DeepSeek.
Core AI Benchmarks Explained
Key Metrics to Consider
How to Choose the Right AI Model for Your Use Case
For Research & Analysis
Prioritize models with high MMLU-Pro (70%+) and GPQA (60%+) scores for complex reasoning tasks, academic research, and technical documentation
For Cost Optimization
Sort by input/output pricing - smaller models often deliver 80% of flagship performance at 10% of the cost for simple tasks
For Math & STEM
Filter by Math Index or AIME 2025 scores (50%+) for quantitative analysis, engineering calculations, and scientific applications
All benchmark scores and pricing data are updated daily from Artificial Analysis to reflect the latest model versions and capabilities. Use the sort filters above to find AI models by intelligence, cost, coding ability, math performance, speed, or release date.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is MMLU-Pro and why is it the standard AI intelligence benchmark?
MMLU-Pro (Massive Multitask Language Understanding - Professional) is the most comprehensive AI benchmark, testing models across 14 academic subjects including mathematics, science, history, law, and ethics. Scores range from 46% (basic competency) to 87% (near-expert level). Models scoring above 75% demonstrate strong general intelligence suitable for professional applications, while scores below 60% indicate limitations in complex reasoning tasks.
What does GPQA measure and which models score highest?
GPQA (Graduate-level Google-Proof Q&A) tests PhD-level reasoning with questions designed to be "Google-proof" - requiring deep understanding rather than simple fact retrieval. Top models like GPT-5.1 (87.3%), GPT-5 mini (82.8%), and o3 (82.7%) excel at GPQA, making them ideal for research, technical analysis, and complex problem-solving. Models below 50% GPQA struggle with advanced reasoning and may provide superficial answers to complex questions.
What is AIME 2025 and how does it evaluate AI mathematical ability?
AIME 2025 (American Invitational Mathematics Examination) is an elite math competition benchmark that tests advanced problem-solving, algebra, geometry, and number theory. Scores above 80% (like GPT-5 Codex at 98.7% or GPT-5.1 at 94%) indicate exceptional mathematical reasoning suitable for engineering, scientific computing, and quantitative analysis. Models scoring below 50% may struggle with multi-step mathematical problems or require explicit problem breakdown.
How is AI model pricing calculated and what's considered cost-effective?
AI model pricing is measured per 1 million tokens (approximately 750,000 words). Input pricing covers text you send, while output pricing covers generated responses. Budget models like Llama 3.3 70B cost $0.54/$0.71 per million tokens, mid-tier models like GPT-5 nano cost $0.05/$0.40, while premium models like GPT-5 cost $1.25/$10. For typical applications with 3:1 input-to-output ratio, budget models can be 10-20x cheaper than flagship models while maintaining 70-80% performance.
Which AI models are best for coding and programming tasks?
Sort by Coding Index to see top programming models. Our Coding Index combines LiveCodeBench, SciCode, and coding benchmarks. Top performers include GPT-5.1 (57.5 index), GPT-5 mini (51.4), and GPT-5 Codex (53.5). These models excel at code generation, debugging, refactoring, and explaining complex algorithms. For budget-conscious developers, models with 40+ coding index scores offer excellent value for routine programming tasks.
How often are AI model benchmarks and rankings updated?
Our leaderboard syncs daily with Artificial Analysis API to ensure benchmark scores (MMLU-Pro, GPQA, AIME 2025), pricing, and inference speed data reflect the latest model versions. New model releases appear immediately under the "Newest" sort option. Benchmark scores can change when providers release updated versions - for example, GPT-5.1 released in November 2025 achieved 69.7 intelligence compared to GPT-5's 68.5 from August 2025.
What inference speed (tokens/second) do I need for my application?
Inference speed determines how fast models generate responses. For real-time chatbots and interactive applications, target 100+ tokens/second (models like gpt-oss-120B at 340 tok/s). For background processing and batch jobs, 50-100 tok/s is sufficient. Premium reasoning models like GPT-5 (103 tok/s) balance speed and capability. Note that higher inference speed doesn't always mean better quality - slower models often deliver more thoughtful, detailed responses.
Can I test these AI models for free before committing?
Yes! Try our free AI chat interface to test open-weight models instantly without creating an account. Many providers also offer free tiers: OpenAI (ChatGPT with daily limits), Anthropic (Claude with usage caps), Google (Gemini free tier), and open-source models like Llama 3.3. Compare performance on your specific use case before upgrading to paid plans.